42
Registered User
Who was the last defenceman to win the Calder for physical domination alone?Because he'll dominate physically and territorially like no rookie D-man ever has.
Barret Jackman in 2003?
Who was the last defenceman to win the Calder for physical domination alone?Because he'll dominate physically and territorially like no rookie D-man ever has.
Because he'll dominate physically and territorially like no rookie D-man ever has.
IS Zegras even eligible since he played 24 games this sseason (43% of his team's) games? Will they adjust the criteria of "rookie" given the abbreivated season?Probably Zegras or Byfield.
I’ll throw in a small notice to keep an eye on Jonatan Berggren if he starts in the NHL.
He's eligible.Is the defined
IS Zegras even eligible since he played 24 games this sseason (43% of his team's) games? Will they adjust the criteria of "rookie" given the abbreivated season?
Nedeljkovic will still be eligible. Starter jn Carolina should win 40 games.
I just don't like the fact that he regressed, a big red flag imoVancouver will have Podkolzin and probably Rathbone.
Podkolzin will likely be given all the opportunity to succeed but it's doubtful he puts up Calder numbers. Just felt the need to throw the homer picks in there
It's Red Wings tradition that our best players finish as runners up and go on to have better careers than the guys that beat them.
Barasso beat Yzerman
Belfour beat Fedorov
Bure beat Lidstrom
Jackman beat Zetterberg (Robbery)
Myers beat Howard (Also robbery)
I'm expecting people to look at Seider's game and not understand the nuance in his game and give the Calder to a 40 point rookie forward instead of the 30 point defenseman.
Also of note, Datsyuk, Osgood, Larkin and a few others have ended up with top 5 calder finishes.
How did he regress? He killed it in the playoffs.I just don't like the fact that he regressed, a big red flag imo
Sorokin too. I can't wait for people to argue that X player on my team should have won because Y played too many games last year as a % of the season.
It's a valid argument. The "games played"-requirement being the same for skaters and goalies is ridiculously stupid.Sorokin too. I can't wait for people to argue that X player on my team should have won because Y played too many games last year as a % of the season.
I just don't like the fact that he regressed, a big red flag imo
He was reported earlier to be 6’3” and is now only 6’1”. He’s pulling a Benjamin Button.How did Pod regress?
Ned and Sorokin are eligible but I don't think they are likely. Sorokin has Varlamov to contend with and barring an injury to the latter, he is at best sharing starts. Ned has had a great couple of months but I think Carolina either re-signs Mrazek or brings in someone else to share the load with Ned so again don't think Ned will get enough games.
If Marco Rossi recovers properly and has successful offseason training, he's the frontrunner