thestonedkoala
Going Dark
- Aug 27, 2004
- 28,255
- 1,617
When was the last time a player with an NMC forced a trade to a contender? Or took an actual discount?
Parise.
When was the last time a player with an NMC forced a trade to a contender? Or took an actual discount?
When did he sign with a contender at a discount/ force a trade to oneParise.
That's not necessarily true. Some players take a discount or waive their NMC to go and chase a Cup.
Yes in his second year.
Isn't the goal to win a cup every year?
He just doesn't strike me as the type of guy who values winning over everything else.
Which is fine when you have a family and other commitments. Nothing wrong with that.
Could be said about all players in the league, nobody is chasing cups.
They signed with Toronto. Not a contender.Thornton and Spezza last year. When Hossa signed for just the 1 year in Detroit.
But yeah, the vast majority of the time, the money is far more guaranteed than a Cup, and that extra money will help you and your family when you're 58 more than any Cup win.
Glory is indeed fleeting. Outside of hardcore hockey nuts, nobody cares if you were on a Cup team 35 years ago. Oh, wait, you have $50k cash to buy this whatever I'm selling? Well hello sir.
Martin St. LouisWhen was the last time a player with an NMC forced a trade to a contender? Or took an actual discount?
I know it's sacrilege to think that an NHL player doesn't want to win a Cup, but either a) signing back with a team (e.g. Marc Staal with Detroit) b) not waiving their NMC/NTC on a rebuilding team and sticking with the team are good indicators that some players either have given up on trying to win a Cup or just isn't interested.
To me, up until he was bought out it didn't seem like Ryan Suter was interested in winning a Cup. Parise, on the other hand, waived his NMC to try and head to a deeper team on Long Island that had a better chance of winning than Minnesota (sorry Minnesota fans), but was quashed by Koivu not waiving his. Rumor was that Suter was more interested in his business interests in Wisconsin than in hockey, but who knows? But all indications was that Suter was happy staying in Minnesota up until his contract ran out even if they didn't have a ton of deep playoff runs.
Your definition of contender is a bit broad. Yes nyr made it to the finals that year but much like dallas and Montreal, wouldn't consider them a "contender"Martin St. Louis
They signed with Toronto. Not a contender.
Hossa, I'll give you
I'd argue your definition of a contender is quite narrow. The Rangers went the Finals the year MSL was added and then the Conference Finals the next year. I mean, short of winning the Cup(s), what else is a team supposed to do in order to be a "contender"?Your definition of contender is a bit broad. Yes nyr made it to the finals that year but much like dallas and Montreal, wouldn't consider them a "contender"
When did he sign with a contender at a discount/ force a trade to one
Hadn't heard this how did koivu block it?Parise waived his NMC specifically to go to the New York Islanders last season. Didn't go through, because of Koivu.
I see he’s beaten your team more than a few times over the years to generate that much saltJudging by ov's contract he doesn't. Nice team friendly contract after banking over 100 million. He's all about catching gretzky on a aging out team and that's it.
He's beat mantracker. Nothing else to doShane Doan
The goal is to make millionsYes in his second year.
Isn't the goal to win a cup every year?
He just doesn't strike me as the type of guy who values winning over everything else.
Which is fine when you have a family and other commitments. Nothing wrong with that.