Xaroc
Registered User
- Aug 3, 2005
- 577
- 0
Carrick and Erskine were both right next to Saad from the top of the circles to the net. Neither one did anything to tie his stick up. How is Carrick not at least partially responsible for not tying Saad's stick up unless you believe that was Erskine's and only Erskine's job and Carrick should have been doing something else completely unrelated to anyone else in that play?
Maybe it was one of those 'I thought you had him' 'and I thought you had him' things but in the end neither had him and it is both of their fault.
Carrick gets more of a ding for the turnover IMO. The fact he actually got back to be anywhere near Saad after leading the rush is pretty impressive. He would have had to go through Erskine to get to Saad to put a stick on him.