Shady Machine
Registered User
- Aug 6, 2010
- 36,705
- 8,141
I'm nitpicking a bit, but I don't think the idea was Kessel for Gally. That wasn't why they moved him. They took a guy with minimal contract length because they wanted the 6.8 to spread out. So basically moving on from Kessel and getting any value back. They nailed it.
Kessel is simply not replaceable. So the idea had to be a full move to youth/skill/speed. I feel the Pens started that campaign.
So another chart of Micah reallllllllly reaching. The story is not Pens moved Kessel for Gally. There is so much more to that move.
What is the story then because they still need to move cap after spending it on Tanev. If Gally stays, he costs close to Kessels cap IMO and they need more money for raises. If he goes, they need a replacement.
I think it was a fine deal until JR blew that money on Tanev.