I bet we could get a ton for Crosby, Malkin, and Letang as well.
In all seriousness, though- this team shouldn't be off-loading contributing players for picks/prospects who wont be able to help the team or years, if ever. I know Kessel bothers people sometimes, but the man produces and is on an INCREDIBLE deal. I can get behind trading Maatta- we have a plethora of D that a making too much, and one, if not two, need to go. Maatta probably has the most value of Maatta/Johnson/Gudbranson, so... I can see it, even if I dont particularly like it.
With the first, I really hope the organization just goes for BPA (so long as it is not a goalie, I guess). As much as this board is optimistic about the pipeline, no Pens' prospect is a can't-miss high-impact player. Draft the best player, and go from there.
Article on Kasper Bjorkqvist from the local Providence paper - "A Natural Born Leader..."
Mark Divver: 'Natural-born leader' Bjorkqvist shows Friars the way
I am talking about a very specific part of the cupboard, that is forwards who won't have started their ELCs next season. The likely high number for that is three, and two is about as likely as three. It'll be one after a year as things stand. We don't have a stockpile of long term college prospects that'll bolster the wave of guys we'll be looking for to be cheap depth players when we have to start paying the incoming wave of Bellerive, Almeida et all in 3-5 years time; we need to be drafting for those guys over the next couple of rounds.
A Kessel trade is actually quite possible this offseason though.
Rutherford seems very good at finding those types either free as college free agents or late round picks. I am not worried about the wave of depth players after Bellerive, Almeida, Johnson, and others. Honestly by the time we need more of those types after this group our Cup contender days will be over. We might make a push like the Sharks did making it to the Cup Finals with some star players in the mid 30’s but let’s face it these next couple years is our best chances.
I agree if the Pens build a strong group around the aging core they could still be strong because I think Crosby will still be one the best players in the league for a long time. I could still see Crosby being above point a game player with great 200 foot game into his upper 30’s if he stays healthy.
It’s funny after writing this a agree with you that we better keep it going because I think Crosby will be great for a long time and Murray is a good young goaltender. If JR keeps making trades like this year adding youth for older UFA players maybe this team can be a top contender for many more years. Getting Pettersson, McCann, Bjugstad, and Gudbranson all with 3 years of control or more this year for UFA players and a floundering prospect was a good way to keep this team competitive for years. It will be hard to pull that off each year but that was amazing asset management for the future while also helping the present.
Well he can't find them if he doesn't pick forwards I think you might be misunderstanding why I originally made the comment - it was solely in refutation of someone saying Rutherford should pick Dmen only next draft; not only do I prefer BPA, but also by the time these guys will come good, we'll need forwards as much as D and maybe more.
As for the rest of it - I think Rutherford's just got to take it one year at a time without doing anything silly. Part of that does involve him making the team younger and keeping the pipeline as strong as possible without sacrificing now just in case we can do a San Jose, but as you say the next few years are probably the best chance so we've got to concentrate on them.
Unfortunately, there’s at least a 50% chance on any given night right now that we’d be a better team if we only traded Kessel for picks. Addition by subtraction.If we have a bad playoffs you might be right but I wouldn’t do it unless it was a great deal. I just don’t see it being worth a deal unless they are giving us a younger top end player and why would a team do that. Hard to get better production for $6.8 million. Kessel still finished top 25 this season and was top 10 last year. For a team wanting to win now you can do a lot worse than having Kessel in your lineup. When you can trade UFA’s that are playing poorly for young players with term that are productive why trade one of your best RW? For the right deal I would think about it but it would have to make our team better.
I agree with you about drafting best player available and posted that myself earlier in this thread.
I really am amazed at how good Rutherford is at improving the team not only for the current year but also the future at the same time. That is something Shero was very bad at and so was Patrick.
When you look at the team when Rutherford took over in the summer of 2014 and see how he has transformed it into a young group around the core is pretty amazing considering going for it every year. From that 2014 playoff roster that played in those playoffs only Crosby, Malkin, Letang, and Maatta are left since Rutherford has taken over. Gone are the Scuderi, Kunitz, Glass, Adams, Goc, Vitale, Gibbons, Stempniak, Sutter, Beannette, Bortuzzo, Martin, and others. Of those players from that playoffs not on our team now only Niskanen and maybe Neal could make our team over someone playing now. Pretty impressive overhaul that he did most of the dumping in a year and a half’s time and transformed into Cup Champs having to unload so many slower aging unproductive players was simply HOF GMing. This season’s trades have been again just amazing transformation of assets. I think Rutherford is very under appreciated on this board.
I’d try and take a Newhook or Pelletier in round 1. Then after we trade Maatta for 2 2nds or something, look for Brett Leason. Also maybe some picks from a Kessel trade.
The kid oozes future captain. By the time Sid hangs 'em up at the end of his contract, Jake will be like 32yrs old and needing a new deal before Sid's final year. Kasper would be the right age to be the future Captain and the guy already is one in College.Sounds like he has a great attitude.
Unfortunately, there’s at least a 50% chance on any given night right now that we’d be a better team if we only traded Kessel for picks. Addition by subtraction.
Nonsense
Timra got relegated. Sucks.
That’s tough. Would have been nice for them to be able to build around Hallander as @rickardr was saying. (And great for his development).
Wonder if the chances he goes to Wilkes-Barre just went up.
Hallander is definitely playing in WBS next year due to that news of Tmira getting relegated. He was already probably going to be playing in WBS next year anyway, but this basically makes it definitive. The Allsvenskan is definitely a lower caliber league than the AHL, while the SHL is on par or better than the AHL, him playing in that league wouldn't be good for his development.
Hallander is definitely playing in WBS next year due to that news of Tmira getting relegated. He was already probably going to be playing in WBS next year anyway, but this basically makes it definitive. The Allsvenskan is definitely a lower caliber league than the AHL, while the SHL is on par or better than the AHL, him playing in that league wouldn't be good for his development.
It’s not definite. WBS is crowded and Pens could just loan him to another SHL team. He’s not bound to play for Timra.
How do they choose what team to loan him to?
I don't think that's how it works.
I don't think you can just pick a SHL team to loan him to willy nilly.