No, but I think the expansion process raised questions within the NHL about Quebecor's ability to pay. It felt like, when I heard and read statements on QC's bid, that maybe elements of how a smaller-market Canadian team would work well might have been glossed over or been more general than the NHL would have liked. There was a lot of rhetoric about QC being the perfect candidate with a built-in, ravenous fan base with a new arena, and by and large I think it's true... but I personally got a different vibe than I did from TNSE when they ended up taking on the Thrashers. TNSE's case was planned out in extreme detail over a period of years, whilst Quebecor's seems more like an Oklahoma land rush by comparison.
It's just my gut feeling so I am in all likelihood wrong - I just read between the lines a bit on some of the statements issued by Bettman and the BoG during the expansion process with regards to QC that led me to believe that one or two ducklings might not be lined up in the right row.
The latest Senate (those referenced are for the House side) agenda (likely for either for Thursday or Friday) will not be posted for a few hours yet...patience...
It's just my gut feeling so I am in all likelihood wrong - I just read between the lines a bit on some of the statements issued by Bettman and the BoG during the expansion process with regards to QC that led me to believe that one or two ducklings might not be lined up in the right row.
The latest Senate (those referenced are for the House side) agenda (likely for either for Thursday or Friday) will not be posted for a few hours yet...patience...
Wayne Gretzky?
Nasty. Like... behind the bench?
If we assume you are right (not saying you are not), NHL did work with Quebecor to save :
a) Quebecor's face
b) NHL's price tag
If Quebecor publicly says they don't have the money to pay. For them, its a disaster for every single business they own in Quebec because they publicly stated being the only company in the whole province being able to bring back the Nordiques.
The $500M price tag has been rumored and widely known way before the expansion process opened. They still went ahead.
Then, if Quebecor publicly declares not being able to pay $500M, then Vegas/Foley is the exception to the rule, not the trend setter.
So, NHL owes as much to Quebecor as Quebecor owes to NHL. They are partners. Quebecor was invited to the official announce all while it was known for months that they were being denied expansion team.
Imo the two ducklings not in a row are Carolina & Arizona (Florida as well but that's 11 years down the road). If the NHL gave an expension to Quebec, what would be their fall back plan if a franchise like the Coyotes need to move in an hurry like Atlanta? I think Quebec is the safety blanket of the NHL and that Quebecor is fine with it.
Jerry Moyes thought he was a genius hiring. *mic drop*
Looks like another 6 bills added. None SB1149. All we need is just a little patience. Mmm, yeah.
the dollar exchange was quite volatile during the 11 months between july 15 when bids were requested and june 16 when vegas was awarded a franchise. where it started and where it ended up were relatively equal around $1.28 but it skyrocketed in jan 2016 to close to $1.50. it's around $1.33 now.
given how much of it's revenues are based in canadian dollars (gate, local and national tv) and player salaries are in us dollars, for a time there it looked like as much as a 20% shortfall. i have no idea how profitable this franchise could potentially be but that would give me pause ... if i were either PKP or Bettman.
i think this is all about money ... and of course, saving a landing spot.
Call it a hunch but I wouldn't be surprised if L'ill Gary surfaces in Arizona in the next few days. The final push will be on.
Call it a hunch but I wouldn't be surprised if L'ill Gary surfaces in Arizona in the next few days. The final push will be on.
What's he going to do? Threaten the Governor in person? Distribute incentives to make things go his way? (I've always wondered if that's what happened before the Glendale vote.)
Call it a hunch but I wouldn't be surprised if L'ill Gary surfaces in Arizona in the next few days. The final push will be on.
He apparently had a one-on-one meeting with Nenshi earlier today about the CalgaryNext project so why not?
Maybe he's on his "new arenas for everyone" trip?
Given his quote for the Flames arena situation, I imagine it might be similar.
"Obviously the Coyotes... the State of Arizona... need a new building. This one is out of date, it's important for the team, it's future and stability. And it's important for the community, it's quality of life... it's a work in progress. And I think with the right commitment from the State... I know Coyotes ownership is working real hard, and hopefully it'll be a reallity much sooner rather then later. Or else, but we're committed to Phoenix."
That's exactly what he doing. He was in EDM to see the new digs and actually used Garth Brooks to justify EDM building the new arena. Then he went to Calgary to tell them they have a dump and that's why Garth Brooks won't come to Calgary.
Bettman feels the fact that Garth Brooks recently sold out nine shows in Edmonton and didn’t even play Calgary is proof that newer arenas offer multi-faceted benefits to cities. The NHL commissioner hopes the success of Rogers Place will spur some action on a new venue for the Flames.
Yup, the ol' city against city business plan. City A has a new bobble so City B needs one as well.
I need to put on hip waders every time Bettman opens his mouth.
Maybe he's on his "new arenas for everyone" trip?
Given his quote for the Flames arena situation, I imagine it might be similar.
"Obviously the Coyotes... the State of Arizona... need a new building. This one is out of date, it's important for the team, it's future and stability. And it's important for the community, it's quality of life... it's a work in progress. And I think with the right commitment from the State... I know Coyotes ownership is working real hard, and hopefully it'll be a reallity much sooner rather then later. Or else, but we're committed to Phoenix."
That's exactly what he doing. He was in EDM to see the new digs and actually used Garth Brooks to justify EDM building the new arena. Then he went to Calgary to tell them they have a dump and that's why Garth Brooks won't come to Calgary.
Bettman feels the fact that Garth Brooks recently sold out nine shows in Edmonton and didn’t even play Calgary is proof that newer arenas offer multi-faceted benefits to cities. The NHL commissioner hopes the success of Rogers Place will spur some action on a new venue for the Flames.
Yup, the ol' city against city business plan. City A has a new bobble so City B needs one as well.
I need to put on hip waders every time Bettman opens his mouth.
Captain Auston Matthews in a Coyotes uniformcarrying the Stanley Cup around the iceat a new 18,000 seat arena in Scottsdalemight do it.
If you're going to daydream, at least have a nice one
To be fair the Saddledome was built in 1983. Before a new arena would be ready to host the Flames it will be around 40 years old. That is a good long life so I don't think saying that it might be time for another building is completely out of line.