Brady was pretty damn good last year. This whole thing is so weird. If you don't have excellent quarterback play, you have no shot unless your goal is to make the playoffs. Think of how off the rails discussion has to be for me to defend Tom Brady.
The Chiefs' OL was destroyed by injury and a COVID opt out. There's no lesson there unless it's that injuries are bad or you can't have a non-functional line.
The idea that Hurts can only either be the starter going forward or absolutely terrible makes no sense to me. The whole point of rushing QBs is that it raises their floor more than it raises their ceiling. I guess you could argue a Vick or Lamar Jackson type raises his ceiling as much with that kind of dynamism, but that's not Jalen Hurts.
My point on Mahomes is simply a top QB can't win without help.
Brady had all day to throw and wide open targets, and a defense which meant he didn't have to force anything - most competent veteran QBs would look good in that situation.
You build the team first, especially the OL, before you get a young QB.
If you have a great team, you can plug in a veteran and win now or give a young QB every chance to succeed.
Put a young QB behind a sieve with mediocre skill players and he'll be running for his life - what we saw last season and on almost every bad team.
This is why AR brought Pederson to play QB while McNabb sat on the bench, let the veteran get the shit beat out of him for a nice payday.
Fortunately for Hurts, the Eagle OL looks like it may return to its previous record of excellence, and Smith, Reagor and Goedert, with a receivers at RB should provide him with a fair chance at showing that he can grow into the job.
How good is Hurts? I don't know. He is raw, learning to read NFL defenses, but has a good enough arm (not a rocket launcher, but throws a nice deep ball with tough, defenses can't crowd him). The running is both an advantage and a curse, he has to learn not to depend on it, but have it in reserve, like an ace up his sleeve.