Is Kase injured again? Because he has yet to play for the Phantoms.
Meanwhile Zamula is off to a ridiculous start, 7g 4-6 10 +10
To put that +10 in perspective, the next three D-men on his team have scored 3 points with +/- -2, -1, +1.
The highest +/- for a forward is +4.
So in this case that actually may be a meaningful statistic, because it's not being inflated by team play.
Bunnaman has been sent down to the Phantoms as per their website.
Rubtsov is extremely inexperienced:
17: 31 MHL games
18: 15 KHL/15 MHL/16 CHL/5 WJC-20
19: 68 CHL/5 WJC-20/9 other Int'l - in those 68g 20-33 53, not exactly a great PD+2 performance
20: 15 AHL games
Experience wise, he's probably 1-2 years behind his age group.
Physically, he's more than "heavy" enough for the NHL, but he really needs a lot of PT.
He is 2x ahead of Bunnaman talent wise though...
and yeh, he has had just 17 AHL games. But he has been a far better player in those 17 games than Bunnaman has managed in his 66.
Plus Rubtsovs disappointing final CHL season was still better than Bunnamans!
Phantoms website did not say whether he would play tonight. And if he does what position would you expect him to play? Center?Phantoms gain massively powerful rabbit mojo. Flyers stuck with canine stench. Seems about right.
Oh, there's no question that Rubtsov is more talented, but given his lack of experience, it's also reasonable that they wanted him to get more AHL experience before bringing him up.
Same with Rubtsov/Vorobyev, Vorobyev has more experience but Rubtsov is the better player.
I mean, I can understand it to a degree... and Vorobyev has played well pretty much his entire time in the NHL too.
But I do think there is more chance he can jump in and be a "big" positive in the bottom six.
I like Vorobyev. But I think his approximate upside is a solid 3C.
Since we'd be bringing up either player to be the 4C (at least to start), their eventual upside shouldn't factor into this decision.
In fact, given Rubtsov's higher upside, they may want to keep him in the AHL where he can get more practice and game time.
I mean, Rubtsov is more likely to be better right now though... improve the team more, and potentially push Laughton back to wing maybe when Patrick ready (or replace Laughton at 3C if Patrick out for a while more).
Yes, but what would be better for Rubtsov's development?
I don't think there is ever a "right" answer, it's a judgement call, but I'd understand why they'd want Rubtsov to play 20-30 AHL games before calling him up.
I think they'd rather "yo-yo" Vorobyev than mess with Rubtsov's development.
Whereas they don't want to bring up Farabee, Frost or Rubtsov unless they're ready to play them consistently the rest of the season.
Phantoms website did not say whether he would play tonight. And if he does what position would you expect him to play? Center?
I am sure he is pissed.....
View attachment 266007
That why we need Frost to move up sometime too. Then if Patrick comes back it's a bonus.Don't assume Patrick will be healthy. This week, next week, next month.... just don't.
I think you have to look no further than Sean Couturier, who according to the narrative had his offensive development stunted by playing such hard defensive minutes as a "prospect" I think he turned out alrightI do as well...
but it did not hurt Carter to play ~half his rookie year on the 4th line.
Look at the St. Louis cup winning team and how many rookies, 2nd year pros etc playing sub-12 a night.
Each case is different. But really how many players can we point to being "ruined" by being in NHL too soon, yo-yoing etc? There probably are some... but there are also players where teams wasted a year or so of their primes (and ELC/RFA years) in a minor league. (Leafs with Andreas Johnsson certainly did... Tyler Johnson, Marchessault, Montour, Tatar, Palmieri too, and a few other guys who while not top 6/4 would have certainly been good 3rd liners for the half season etc were not called up)
I do as well...
but it did not hurt Carter to play ~half his rookie year on the 4th line.
Look at the St. Louis cup winning team and how many rookies, 2nd year pros etc playing sub-12 a night.
Each case is different. But really how many players can we point to being "ruined" by being in NHL too soon, yo-yoing etc? There probably are some... but there are also players where teams wasted a year or so of their primes (and ELC/RFA years) in a minor league. (Leafs with Andreas Johnsson certainly did... Tyler Johnson, Marchessault, Montour, Tatar, Palmieri too, and a few other guys who while not top 6/4 would have certainly been good 3rd liners for the half season etc were not called up)