5th goal of the year.
There's almost certainly no spot on the flyers for this kid next year, but is there really any way they can send him back to juniors? Anyone know what the rules are for CHL vs. AHL next year? He sure seems to be having no problem adjusting to the pro game so far. I am so excited for him. Hard to imagine a player I want to succeed more than Wisdom.
5th goal of the year.
Stop! He was the dinosaur “try hard pick” this whole board guaranteed fletcher would make.Fletcher traded:
116 & 147 to move up to 94 (Wisdom).
202 & 209 to move up to 135 (Desnoyers).
So effectively they moved from 116 to 94 and 147 to 135.
Wisdom may be their best "steal" since Lindblom.
Stop! He was the dinosaur “try hard pick” this whole board guaranteed fletcher would make.
Could have been the funniest thing ever posted here!
I guess you could do worse for your value than be stapled to Shane Wright, who isn't even draft eligible until 2022.
This looks like your stereotypical high floor, grinding Flyers mid-rounder, but it looks like Zayde has respectable hockey skill and . There's certainly room for these types, and maybe he's more than the sum of his parts.
That does seem funny! The whole board posted that? Wow! I do remember things like this though:
Wisdom has hockey ability, but he is pretty physically superior to his peers, so it’s not surprising to see him succeed quickly. It also doesn’t necessarily address his ceiling. Few disliked the pick as far as having NHL potential; I’d wager people were more unenthusiastic about the picks prior. But by all means: go for that SLAM DUNK for a player you probably never saw!
I must have struck a chord. So, he is physically superior to his peers in the AHL? In your opinion he was a bad 4th round pick. Thank you.
Logic? Your logically statement is? I love, the old go to the insults when I make a fool of myself. Nice job!Yes, he’s probably physically comparable to many pros. Wisdom was 5’9 and 225lbs at age 15. He looks slimmer and fitter if anything as a pro.
In my opinion? The previous quote was my opinion. You seem like logic isn’t your strong suit, but you got us all real good! Here’s a napkin for the spittle.
He’s going to be a stud top 4 dman in a few years.I mean I’m glad he’s doing it opposed to nothing but it’s been like 6 games for a guy who’s still likely years away from the NHL.
Logic? Your logically statement is? I love, the old go to the insults when I make a fool of myself. Nice job!
My statement referred to someone who posted, and several agreed, 2 seconds after the pick it was a typical dinosaur pick fletcher would make. Knowing absolutely nothing about the player. If it was you so be it.
Secondary assist for York.
Your original, post was a lame attempt to troll an imagined narrative, without providing a single cogent point. No commentary, no assessment of his game, substance just shy of zero. Have you even watched him? You a Kingston die hard? I don’t even know who complains about Fletcher and “dinosaur” picks. His 2 years here includes a lot of undersized and statistical profile picks. I know I’m wasting my time, so a parting gift:
Imagined narrative? So I just made it up? I saw it posted, minutes if not seconds after his pick? Why the f*** would I make that up? We should all be happy he is showing well so far. No. I didn’t say I watched him every game. In fact I said several times his draft tape showed more skill then the experts on this board claimed. If that was you, I’m sorry.Your original, post was a lame attempt to troll an imagined narrative, without providing a single cogent point. No commentary, no assessment of his game, substance just shy of zero. Have you even watched him? You a Kingston die hard? I don’t even know who complains about Fletcher and “dinosaur” picks. His 2 years here includes a lot of undersized and statistical profile picks.
You made me check. It was striiker. With 6 likes. Something to the effect... this was the try-hard low floor pick I was expecting. So it wasn’t an imagined narrative. It was the narrative on that pick. So keep yapping. Feel free to jump into something with ZERO knowledge of the conversation. Nicely done!Your original post was a lame attempt to troll an imagined narrative, without providing a single cogent point. No commentary, no assessment of his game, substance just shy of zero. Have you even watched him? You a Kingston die hard? I don’t even know who complains about Fletcher and “dinosaur” picks. His 2 years here includes a lot of undersized and statistical profile picks. I know I’m wasting my time, so a parting gift:
Your original post was a lame attempt to troll an imagined narrative, without providing a single cogent point. No commentary, no assessment of his game, substance just shy of zero. Have you even watched him? You a Kingston die hard? I don’t even know who complains about Fletcher and “dinosaur” picks. His 2 years here includes a lot of undersized and statistical profile picks. I know I’m wasting my time, so a parting gift:
Thank you. That’s all I was saying. It’s amazing how many on this board would rather see a player fail instead of helping the team if it makes their opinion look better.Does “try-hard floor pick” meet the dinosaur standard? That post from someone who never watched Wisdom play, got nine likes on the 1st page of his draft thread.
But my memory of that thread is that most people were neutral or positive, and then there were a few outrageous Goulbourne comparisons.
Does “try-hard floor pick” meet the dinosaur standard? That post from someone who never watched Wisdom play, got nine likes on the 1st page of his draft thread.
But my memory of that thread is that most people were neutral or positive, and then there were a few outrageous Goulbourne comparisons.
Stop! He was the dinosaur “try hard pick” this whole board guaranteed fletcher would make.
You made me check. It was striiker. With 6 likes. Something to the effect... this was the try-hard low floor pick I was expecting. So it wasn’t an imagined narrative. It was the narrative on that pick.
Striker said:There's the try-hard floor pick I was waiting for.
ChurchOfAlfie said:Sounds like you guys aren't too thrilled with the pick. My two cents...
I watched a ton of Wisdom last season, and he quickly became my favorite non-big-name prospect in the draft. Every single time I watched him, one name kept popping up in my head: Brandan Gallagher. Wisdom has a really similar physique. Not the tallest guy, but very strong. He's a bulldog like Gallagher, absolutely fearless. He fought 6'7", 240lb Kevin Bahl as a 16 year old. Will gladly go to the dirty areas and battle. Scored a lot of goals parked right in the blue paint. Has some skill though, he's definitely not a plug.
It's a mistake, in my opinion, to simply attribute his point production last year to playing with Wright. Wisdom drastically improved his skating, which was the biggest factor in his offensive improvement compared to his 16 year old season. Wisdom certainly wasn't passenger on that line. Furthermore, it took Wright a little while to adjust to the OHL before really taking off in the second half of the season. Despite that, Wisdom was right around PPG the entire year. He had an extremely consistent year.