And so do I! And the severance package is based on what they did and how long they were employed prior to being let go. For example: IF you work for a company for say two years and I work for that same company for say ten years, and we had similar jobs within the company, my severance package relative to yours would be much more lucrative.
Again from the Dept of Labor:Instead of trying to play I know more than you on this maybe you want to bring it back to the initial point of why you would pay to get rid of someone who isn’t performing for you and how it relates to Bjugstad and why this decision was made by GMJR and how it relates to the Pens.
This back and forth proving what you know or don’t know about severance has ran it’s comedic value.
I’m guessing the FO has some idea on where Bjugstad’s health is and what it’s likely to be next season.
Again from the Dept of Labor:
Severance pay is often granted to employees upon termination of employment. It is usually based on length of employment for which an employee is eligible upon termination. There is no requirement in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for severance pay. Severance pay is a matter of agreement between an employer and an employee (or the employee's representative). The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) may be able to assist an employee who did not receive severance benefits under their employer-sponsored plan. Please contact EBSA if you have any questions.
I'm not making this up. lol
I'm showing you that my point was accurate. I have no idea what the hell you're trying to prove. lolNo you are just trolling at this point. You’ve proved you can use Google. Congratulations.
CBA Gurus:
do retained trades count against the player contract limit?
Just read Yohe’s interview of GMJR on the athletic. Hold your butts he admitted more deals are coming.
Sounds like he wants someone in free agency which means he’s going to have to deal/dump salary to play in that poker game.
Do tell please. Coles notes are fine.There are some interesting quotes by JR in The Athletic. It might cast this trade in a different light for some.
Do tell please. Coles notes are fine.
I’m guessing the FO has some idea on where Bjugstad’s health is and what it’s likely to be next season.
The covid situation means a lot of teams don't know how much money they'll be able to make, which means a lot of teams are scrambling to cut their expenditure, and cap hit, in order to facilitate this. JR also makes the point that a lot of teams were anticipating a rise in cap of between $3-6M, which obviously did not happen with the pandemic. A lot of teams are in shitty situations.
My personal opinion is that a lot of teams are going to operate on internal caps which are far lower than the actual cap, until everything is back to normal. If it ever is. I doubt you'll see many pure cap dumps where a team takes on 100% of the salary of the cap dump.
I’m guessing the FO has some idea on where Bjugstad’s health is and what it’s likely to be next season.
What's probably irking most people is that if we have to retain 50% on Bjugstad, what is the ungodly price we'll have to pay to rid ourselves of JJ?
People don't want to hear this, but I think the best option is going to be to bribe Seattle to take him next year. It'll cost a draft pick, presumably high, but then you're rid of his entire cap hit. So he'll be here for however many games are played next season.
Instead of seeing the continued overreaction to this trade last night, I watched a documentary on the Rwandan genocide. And the people who were interviewed in it had a more level-headed reaction to what they went through than those complaining about this trade.