Yeah, we outscore everyone in the regular season. Playoffs, another story. A guy like Yak would help tremendously with that, provided he can cope with the hard hitting style in the playoffs.
That's a question mark, but to say he wouldn't help us at all is a bit too much.
That...is actually a pretty tantalizing idea, although I guess it remains to be seen whether Yak will actually live up to his hype. And I don't think Yakupov is going to be moved for Dupuis+Niskanen - Edmonton already has a lot of good forwards, it's their defense that needs to be primarily addressed.
They're also 27th in the league as far as PK goes, and most of their forward depth is on left wing. Take out Yakupov that leaves them with Eberle and Hemsky on right wing. That was my thinking anyway. Don't follow EDM that closely, so yeah. Mostly it was to move Duper, because if we kept him no way he's coming off of Sid's line and that would make both proposed trades kinda moot, much like we saw last season.
And SEALBound ... those lines are pretty sweet, too.
Lines would and should be:
Kunitz-Crosby-Simmonds
Yakopov-Malkin-Neal
Bennett-Sutter-Jokinen
To be honest anything of this caliber would be something like:
Fleury + Harrington/Pouliot + Engo
For
Yakupov + Dubs + 2nd
Nah. For starters, Yakupov isn't a LW and we'd run into the same issue with Iggy being on Malkin's line: two primary goal scorers on the wings. I also don't really like the idea of a Kunitz-Simmonds tandems on Sid's wing, there still wouldn't be anyone who could create on their own.
I would do:
Bennett-Crosby-Yakupov
Kunitz-Malkin-Neal
Jokinen-Sutter-Simmonds
in the fictitious world that could actually happen.
The Pens or anyone else will be able to get Yak for (a lot?) less in a few years. He's no Daigle, but he's closer to Daigle than to 87 or 66.
Nah. For starters, Yakupov isn't a LW and we'd run into the same issue with Iggy being on Malkin's line: two primary goal scorers on the wings. I also don't really like the idea of a Kunitz-Simmonds tandems on Sid's wing, there still wouldn't be anyone who could create on their own.
I would do:
Bennett-Crosby-Yakupov
Kunitz-Malkin-Neal
Jokinen-Sutter-Simmonds
in the fictitious world that could actually happen.
With Yakupov sitting for the Oilers, and the Pens having some foward injury issues, i think the Oilers could budge if we would trade one of our young "D" prospects with a 2nd rounder for Yakupov... Mind you for Yak did do fairly well scoring last year...
So someone fill me in, because it makes a huge difference as to what I would offer.
In this hypothetical trade are we trading for the first overall pick who we can imagine is a mixture of Crosby, Mario and Malkin all rolled into one, because he was taken first overall.
Or would we be trading for the self described floater who does not care to do anything but take shots on goal, and who makes Charmin look like sandpaper in comparison?
I am not really sure which of these Yak's we are talking about.
BB-Crosby-Neal <---- If BB was a Canadian it would be called team Canada
Kulemin-Malkin-Yakupov <------ The all Russian line or team Russia
Kunitz-Sutter-Simmonds <---- Team Hurt or the Hurt line.
So someone fill me in, because it makes a huge difference as to what I would offer.
In this hypothetical trade are we trading for the first overall pick who we can imagine is a mixture of Crosby, Mario and Malkin all rolled into one, because he was taken first overall.
Or would we be trading for the self described floater who does not care to do anything but take shots on goal, and who makes Charmin look like sandpaper in comparison?
I am not really sure which of these Yak's we are talking about.
So is nearly every other 1st overall pick. How is that a relevant comparison?
The point is the Oilers, having only drafted him as a number 1 pick recently, would probably still value him as an overall number 1 pick on the trade market. Over time, IMHO, his trade value will go down because his play - assuming he is not scratched every night - will not reflect how the Oilers currently value him. Thus, anyone paying what the Oilers would demand at this time would be overpaying.
Where he ultimately and exactly falls in the spectrum of past overall #1s is an interesting question, but one that I'm not prepared to explore at this time. I suspect he will be in the bottom 50% - i.e., closer to Daigle than to 66/87.
Does that help?
Plan the parade
That would be a pretty sweet top 9
Your 2014/15 Pittsburgh Penguins! We also got Lundqvist!