is there any reason at all to expect Zatkoff to become a good NHL goalie? I was under the impression that he is pretty much an AHL signing who has the same basic playoff problems as Fleury. I don't want him to be our backup.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 2m
Tim Thomas's 1 yr deal in FLA has base salary of $2.5M but an AAV of $3.75M because of potential performance/GP bonuses. He plays tonight.
Let's not forget that Zatkoff doesn't have the most glowing reputation for playoff play himself... it's perhaps even worse that Fleury's.
http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=10457
Code:[FONT="Courier New"]SEASON TEAM LEAGUE GP GAA SV% ------- ------------------------------ ------ -- ---- ---- 2004-05 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 8.88 .706 2008-09 Ontario Reign ECHL 7 3.73 .872 2010-11 Manchester Monarchs AHL 5 3.80 .891 2011-12 Manchester Monarchs AHL 2 4.34 .865 2012-13 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins AHL 5 5.45 .838[/FONT]
It's fairly unusual to see a goalie struggle in playoffs at every level then suddenly put it together in the NHL. Fleury's history isn't much better. Going back to his QMJHL days, he's only put up a .900 or better sv% in 3 out of 14 trips to the playoffs.
I think we should move forward with what we have, evaluate MAF and Zatkoff, and then make a move depending on the circumstances.I'm just curious, if Voukon announces his retirement, would you want to move forward with Fleury/Zatkoff and see whats available come trade deadline or pickup a goalie now?
Wut do?
Inasmuch as this organization makes that mistake (and it does), I think the goaltending position is a completely different animal. This is a Stanley Cup contending team, you need an insurance policy in the event that your goaltender goes down (or craps the bed as Fleury is wont to do). That guy shouldn't be a rookie, unless you feel comfortable that said rookie could realistically backstop the team to a championship. Zatkoff will get his turn, but it shouldn't be as a shaky MAF's backup this season.
I hear that Reimer might be available. I think he is a legitimate upgrade to all available options.
is there any reason at all to expect Zatkoff to become a good NHL goalie? I was under the impression that he is pretty much an AHL signing who has the same basic playoff problems as Fleury. I don't want him to be our backup.
I don't know why people are upset about sending Zatkoff down. If he doesn't have several outstanding postseasons, I don't ever want to see him with the big club.
I don't know why people are upset about sending Zatkoff down. If he doesn't have several outstanding postseasons, I don't ever want to see him with the big club.
As someone else has already said, if they're not even trusting him now to serve as a backup, why is he in this organization? To steal playing time from the prospects?
I don't see why they need to make a hectic move for some random washed up veteran now. Just roll with Zatkoff and MAF until the deadline (I'm pretty confident we get there alive with them) and then see who's available. If Bernier has taken over the starting job, Reimer will come cheaper. Thomas probably could be had (and by then we'll have a better understanding of what he's got left). We'll also know more about Vokoun by then.
Getting someone like Theodore or even Hedberg now accomplishes absolutely nothing.
I imagine almost any vetern backup they can sign would immediately negate them getting under the cap by placing Vokoun on LTIR. I think they're just putting out feelers on a guy like Theodore. But by all means PANIC.
Which prospects? Isn't Hartzell the only goalie besides Zatkoff eligible for the minors? If anything, be mad about having Peter Mannino on an AHL deal to take time from him.
I figure they signed Zatkoff to see if he could show anything as a potential long-term backup while Vokoun played out his deal. It was a pretty sensible move at the time considering how bare the goalie cupboard was last year.
Complaining about him stealing time from imaginary prospects for a year is ridiculous. If Hartzell's any good (maybe even if he's not), odds are Zatkoff is gone after this year (and even when he signed there was a really good chance that would happen) unless he turns out to be a legitimate NHL backup.
Which prospects? Isn't Hartzell the only goalie besides Zatkoff eligible for the minors? If anything, be mad about having Peter Mannino on an AHL deal to take time from him.
I figure they signed Zatkoff to see if he could show anything as a potential long-term backup while Vokoun played out his deal. It was a pretty sensible move at the time considering how bare the goalie cupboard was last year.
Complaining about him stealing time from imaginary prospects for a year is ridiculous. If Hartzell's any good (maybe even if he's not), odds are Zatkoff is gone after this year (and even when he signed there was a really good chance that would happen) unless he turns out to be a legitimate NHL backup.