I admit that I don’t watch a ton of the Jets, but from the little that I saw Tanev seems to have tunnel vision when he does have the puck on his stick.
He's a 2m player. He fits our style but is a bottom 6 guy. 50 ****ing points in his career. 21m. JR is a ****ing lunatic.
I'm friends with a Jets fan who was really sad to see him go but nothing makes the term/value any less insane. JR has gotta go before he can strike again next July 1.
One million per year or one and a half million overpaid, does it matter?
At least the Pens finally are moving toward building a team that won them back to back cups instead of whatever the hell they were trying to do starting with Reaves.
I get this signing even if it was too rich, too long. It makes sense. It fits.
I can't say the same for too many signings the past couple of years.
One million per year or one and a half million overpaid, does it matter?
At least the Pens finally are moving toward building a team that won them back to back cups instead of whatever the hell they were trying to do starting with Reaves.
I get this signing even if it was too rich, too long. It makes sense. It fits.
I can't say the same for too many signings the past couple of years.
No he's not, he's overpaid but it's ridiculous to say it's by $1.5 million.
Lets wait and see what is ridiculous. I consider Tanev a very good 4th line checker with a ceiling of being a very good 4th line checker.
It actually is right in the same vein as paying questionable 4th line and bottom pairing D term and cash. See: Fehr, Hunwick, JJ, etc.
It actually is right in the same vein as paying questionable 4th line and bottom pairing D term and cash. See: Fehr, Hunwick, JJ, etc.
You keep mixing in guys who were bad fits from the start with overpaid. There is a difference.
I can almost guarantee Tanev will never be useless on this team. I go back to the opposite of guys who bring nothing when not scoring.
Now if you said that the Pens could get many of the same things, maybe not as good as Tanev does, but many of the same things, for less, you have me.
But tossing out examples that simply do not fit to make your point does not work.