Dipsy Doodle
Rent A Barn
- May 28, 2006
- 76,590
- 21,129
You don't become a 25 minute a night, 60+ point Dman without having hockey IQ.
I dunno. I think we saw 2 of 'em go head-to-head in the '16 Finals.
You don't become a 25 minute a night, 60+ point Dman without having hockey IQ.
Top 10 players are usually closer to NHL ready than later round picks. That's why Pouliot made his NHL debut as a 20 year old. Unfortunately it seems like he's done zero development in the past 3 years.
I get that, and often show draft position along with chance of making it to the NHL, or having a career of more than a year. Far more bust than people think.
I am just saying that after this length of time it does not really matter where one was drafted.
Pouliot does not have a lesser chance of putting it together in his mid 20's than someone drafted in a lower round or undrafted at all. Nor a better chance. Draft position at this point is irrelevant.
As an aside though talking about draft position even though I said that it is irrelevant. He is just the kind of player that the Pens have had success plucking from other teams. Mid-round to late round firsts who haven't put it together. I say mid to late firsts as that is where he should have been drafted. If they have success turning around players like that from other teams, let's hope one last look this year works with him. They certainly could use him if he does finally put it together.
Those players (Niskanen, Cole, Schultz) were all proven NHLers that went through tough stretches and the Pens resurrected their careers. I'm not saying it can't happen with Pouliot. I'm just pointing out that it's a different situation.
I am still cautiously optimistic about Pouliot. This year is his last big chance with the Pens. Hope he takes advantage of it.
The issue I take with the Dumo comparison is that Dumo was never "all or nothing" as a player. Pouliot is "offensive/PP specialist or bust." Nobody expected great things defensively, and he's looked absolutely atrocious in that respect, but outside of a couple of games in the ~60 or so he's played at the NHL level, he's been an absolute non-factor offensively or in transition.
Again, hoping he proves me and a lot of people wrong, but it's gonna take a Hell of a jump in his development/conditioning/intensity for him to even sniff the NHL on a regular basis. The dude has been flat-out trash for the vast, vast majority of his time with the big club.
I don't agree with that. Prior to last year, Pouliot had 14 points in 56 games with little in the way of PP time, which is a fine start offensively.
I think there's some recency bias against Pouliot based on his poor season last year.
Agreed. He had some solid performances the previous two years.I don't agree with that. Prior to last year, Pouliot had 14 points in 56 games with little in the way of PP time, which is a fine start offensively.
I think there's some recency bias against Pouliot based on his poor season last year.
Hopefully we see some more of Archibald this year. Pouliot....man, he really has to take a step forward. Gonch, work your magic, please.
Pouliot is the prototypical Pens D man. Good hands, pretty fast, not a ton of size/strength. He tears up the AHL. His problem is that he has mental lapses and bad luck. Just about every mistake he's made in the NHL has cost the team. If he can stay focused he can absolutely become a valuable member of the NHL team.
Pouliot is the prototypical Pens D man. Good hands, pretty fast, not a ton of size/strength. He tears up the AHL. His problem is that he has mental lapses and bad luck. Just about every mistake he's made in the NHL has cost the team. If he can stay focused he can absolutely become a valuable member of the NHL team.
Most here don't seem too optimistic. Why would managment sign him to a one way if they are, as here, not optomistic? I know its just a one year deal but still.
On the flip side, I think there's also a tendency for some to remember his play in Portland when evaluating what he is now.
He's looking more like our version of Ryan Murphy than he is the future PP QB people envisioned when he was first drafted.
Agreed. He had some solid performances the previous two years.
This is based only on last year, where he obviously struggled.
Granted we were all hoping that Pouliot would be taking a step forward at that crucial time instead of taking a step back, but his performance from the 2012 draft through to the spring of 2016 at every successive level (Jrs, Int'l, AHL, NHL) was what you expect from a top 10 pick. When we acquired Schultz, Pouliot looked like an NHL defenseman.
For me, that progression is enough to make me want to see if last year was an aberration or the start of a Murphy-esque slide into obscurity, especially since it pretty much costs us nothing to do so. Maybe I'm reading the board wrong, but the decision to re-sign Pouliot seems to be characterized as a total waste by a lot of posters.
For me, I'm indifferent about the signing. It's not a lot of money, and I'm still okay with them giving him a shot. The problem is, will he even get a shot? With a healthy defense, he's #8 on the depth chart, and based on his play last year, he's not the type of player who can excel if he's sitting in the press box 5 games, plays 1 game, sits another 3, plays 2, etc.
To be honest, though, I've never been high on his performance. Even at his very best in the NHL, all I saw was someone who could perform like Chad Ruhwedel. And that was at his very best. I never saw a guy who looked like he had the potential to be a legitimate top four defenseman, and I certainly never saw this high-end offensive ability. At best, his puck moving was good. But I never saw any actual offense.
You have to go with what you've seen. Can DP turn it around? Hell yes. I've seen crazier turnarounds. Is it likely he will turn it around? No. It's not likely at all. His game had so many flaws that he needs a downright miracle to get his confidence back up. He also needs a miracle for the situation to allow itself for him to play (unfortunately injuries).
And he also just needs a tad bit of luck on the ice. So many of his mistakes turned into goals. Sometimes you can make mistakes and not pay for them. And sometimes you are just out there for goals that your team is scoring getting some easy assists and some easy +s on your side. He needs that. Gain some confidence and continue moving forward.
But if you had to put odds on it, more than likely he's going to be waived or moved for pennies. But let's hope the underdog rises up on this one and prove everyone wrong.