Andy99
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 51,026
- 33,105
I hope one of the many scouts in attendance fell in love with ZAR.
Please, God, help us out here.
He’s the new Kuhn and Rowney rolled into one...and that makes him damn near untradeable....
I hope one of the many scouts in attendance fell in love with ZAR.
Please, God, help us out here.
I hope one of the many scouts in attendance fell in love with ZAR.
Please, God, help us out here.
Isn't that kinda like saying water is wet?
Rowney and Kuhn's new contracts say that that is false.He’s the new Kuhn and Rowney rolled into one...and that makes him damn near untradeable....
You for real? .921 last year. North of .922 now.I have. They are still not good.
First of all, you miserable curmudgeon, thread titles are my turf. Second of all, tonight's thread title is an homage to @ColePens, and frankly I'm offended that you would rain on his parade in this way.
EDIT: Offender, but mind you not surprised.
There's always someone who does.I can't imagine there's a scout in hockey who possibly could love ZAR more than the Penguins organization does.
In all seriousness I don't like only having one D man who's a righty. We have enough problems in our end. I don't like the fact that our 2hd and 3rd pairings on the right side are constantly on their back hand.Yes, but sometimes we need to be reminded.
I hope one of the many scouts in attendance fell in love with ZAR.
Please, God, help us out here.
Curmudgeon?
How old are you? I thought that I was old.
I thought that they stopped using words like that back when Dicken's was writing his cheery novels in weekly form in the papers.
13+ mins I believe, yes. He was decent. I see the weaknesses to his game that Ducks fans were talking about though.Did Pettersson play?
You for real? .921 last year. North of .922 now.
What would you like him to do more? He's only surrendered over 3 goals once in his 13 starts. He gives us a chance to win night in, night out.
Meanwhile Murray allowed 4+ in 7 of his 11 starts.
I just hope those initials indicate a very remarkable coincidence.One did. Two in fact.
Unfortunately their initials are BG and JR.
I understand this waiver thing, but I thought that they are all about winning games, just as Riikola was getting in the groove, they put this abooration of a pair togetherSo . . . anyone else like the Maatta-Oleksiak pairing as much as I do?
Hey, just because I bought my wooden dentures the same time as George Washington doesn't give you the right to mock my age . . .
as crazy as it may sound I would take Määttä over those two. Oleksiak's and Johnson's hockey IQ are lowest in the leagueBTW people we can all agree and disagree about many things around here, but if there's one thing that should unite all of us, it is the universal hockey law that Jack Johnson, Jamie Oleksiak, and Olli Maatta ALL ******* SUCK.