if it was family first, he should have went year to year and not signed a multi year contract like lidstrom did in his last few years
Right? Like who wouldn't want to spend more time with their children and not have to worry about work? Yes, its a more "noble" reason than just retiring because you "don't have it in you anymore" or some crock like that, but Datsyuk knew his family situation was complicated beforehand (at least its been presented as such for a few years now). The organization has given him about as drama-free and competitive an environment as any professional athlete could desire, and he's going to screw the Wings over with $7.5M in dead space? No.
Only way I can buy into "family reasons" as wholly absolving him is if someone has a serious health issue. Then by all means...But if its less than that, honor the organization that ****ing allowed your family to live the lifestyle they currently have. Its not like he was some ISS sweetheart. Without this organization, he might not even be playing professional hockey.
the family thing has been out there for years, well before he signed his last contract.
So unless some serious health issue within his family just came up, I don't like him bailing on the wings because of family reasons. not when it leaves 7.5 million of dead cap space with it
He's earned the right to leave, frankly.
I'll be sad. I'll be disappointed. I won't hold it against him.
Even with him we aren't competing for a cup next season most likely.
Datsyuk retiring would be the best thing possible for this franchise. We're not winning the cup this year, next year, or the year after. Datsyuk retiring would force Holland to make a decision, he wouldn't be able to use Datsyuk as a crutch to be fake competitive.
http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/h...-could-help-the-red-wings-get-steven-stamkos/
I don't know what to make of this
Nothing, since losing Dats wouldn't clear any cap space for us anyway.http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/h...-could-help-the-red-wings-get-steven-stamkos/
I don't know what to make of this
Nothing, since losing Dats wouldn't clear any cap space for us anyway.
Unless we could still trade his contract to a team that needs to reach the cap floor.
the article says that we could trade his contract to a team that needs to reach cap floor+they don't have to pay him a dime. arizona is already doing this with pronger
http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/h...-could-help-the-red-wings-get-steven-stamkos/
I don't know what to make of this
we said that after lidstrom retired too
Are there any teams that this is a possibility for? There can't be that many cap floor teams and as you said, Arizona is already using Pronger.
Edit: Guess they mention the Coyotes as still being a possibility.
Are there any teams that this is a possibility for? There can't be that many cap floor teams and as you said, Arizona is already using Pronger.
Edit: Guess they mention the Coyotes as still being a possibility.
How does recap penalty work then? I thought for 35+ contracts the team that signed them gets the penalty even when that player gets traded. Making the Hossas and Zetterbergs and Franzens of the NHL toxic contracts for the team that signed them. But we could trade Dats to the Yotes and they can terminate, we don't get the penalty, and they do? I don't get it.
If the Wings look to rebuild next season Datsyuk leaving could be a blessing in their tanking endeavors. Low cap and one of your best players gone? Hello high pick!
0% chance of them tanking year before they move to a brand new arena. kenny would obviously have to make some changes if datsyuk were to leave.
There's more smoke to this than we originally suspected. A little more worried now.
It certainly does take on a whole new life when both the Agent and the GM don't completely dismiss the story.
He's earned the right to leave, frankly.
I'm not 100% on all of that but I think that Datsyuks situation would be different than the hossa and Z ones because those were blatant cap circumventions. I believe the datsyuk situation would be similar to a pronger one where the team loses that cap space but doesn't have to pay him real dollars. other teams this could work for are teams with an "internal cap"
For free? And saddling the team with a huge cap hit? Hell no he hasn't.
You sign the contract, you play.
Now, if he wants to spend his final year in the league playing for a real contender, great. Trade him for assets at least. If he walks out on the team for nothing I can't think of a more disrespectful action against this organization considering all that its given him.
For free? And saddling the team with a huge cap hit? Hell no he hasn't.
You sign the contract, you play.
Now, if he wants to spend his final year in the league playing for a real contender, great. Trade him for assets at least. If he walks out on the team for nothing I can't think of a more disrespectful action against this organization considering all that its given him.