Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 6,838
- 8,033
Yes 999 out of 1000 people would agree that this team is without a doubt better with Nico than they are without him.And that right there is exactly why we are, where we are, today. If Nico Hischier is labeled as one of your best players, you’re in trouble and guess what, we’re in trouble. Yes, our goaltending sucks blablabla but thrown in Vasilevski in nets and we’re still not making the playoffs.
Saying this team is better with Nico than without him is a fact but what’s being discussed here is to trade Nico for an equivalent or better asset, at a position of weakness in a area of weakness.
Add all those components together and I truly believe we’re a better team with the guys I’ve mentioned repeatedly over Nico Hischier.
In terms of trading Nico for Laine I disagree with you. It’s been heavily discussed and I understand to an extent but I personally don’t believe trading Nico for Laine makes us a better overall team.
No matter what we would be trading from an area of some strength to address an area of weakness and we’d then have a new area of weakness at C. I also believe Mercer has more potential as a winger. As someone else said above we’d be “rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic”.
I don’t think Laine is a better player than Nico and I think once we get our current core players including Nico some support they will really thrive. That might take a couple more years and we should definitely look at trades to speed it up but I don’t think that’s the trade.
Nico is also our captain and clearly plays with his heart and soul and puts his body on the line every game. I think he’s actually a good leader on and off the ice from what we can see as fans and the players in the room clearly like him and I doubt they would want him to be traded unless it’s an obvious move that can’t be refused.