A bit similar thoughts about that for me too. But in fact it could also be because Petan didn’t really play in too many games last season. So the sample size might not give the true picture of him. On the other hand when I saw him play, he wasn’t really that impressive at all. And in fact in some games Hendricks even managed to surprise me quite positively. On the other hand, the more towards the end of the season, the more of putrid crap his game was too.Hard to say. Maybe Hendricks is better than people think. Maybe Petan is worse than people think. Or maybe, if Corsica can't really differentiate between them, it might not be a very good system?
Stats just confuse me. I'm kind of with the guy that thought that one graphic looked like a hard drive in need of defragging.
Anyway, it might after all even tell that Petan is really not as good as many of us think he is. I have even had quite high hopes in him still maybe really breaking through in the NHL. He should have the skills and the IQ do make it happen. But on the other hand his strength has been so far so weak and also he has been a pretty weak skater for being that small of a player. So it could be as well that Corsica’s model just shows how inefficient Petan is because of those weaknesses that he has. Maybe it even reflects what class of a player he is after all at the NHL level. I hope not, but the starting season might already give some answers.
Laine is anyway great and he will almost for sure be still developing a lot for several years. Honestly I have to admit that my expectations for the next season are even maybe going too high. Might be better to still hold on and take it easy to not get after all disappointed.