Neither true nor funny.
Yup, there are some guys that haven't seen the light and oddly there were some putting eg. Connor ahead of Laine on 5-on-5 game during last season when "Farmer O'Connor was enjoying highlife" and Laine stuck with that dysfunctional line. Then at certain point you could made a cherry picked stat with a very questionable way to express the result of that stat to prove your point like
@Maukkis did. There was that 6-10th best forward thing.
After EStL and regular season, things looked really different, but at points yeah, some of the less bright ones did really call for Laine to be sent into Moose, and in overall there was let's say "much less love" (to put it lightly) towards Laine.
I predict that one thing will continue: if Laine doesn't score, certain posters will say that he played a bad game. Some people can really see him in in positive light only when he scores. Then they love him. These same people will be just puzzled why Laine shines on winning GF against GA, as they show how in those virtual, Corsi-based stats Laine is an average guy, so that he just happens to be so lucky to have high GF and relatively low GA when he is on ice 5-on-5. So my prediction is that Laine continues to be "lucky", even if luck doesn't really exist on large sample sizes.