I think I've been pretty fair here. I understand where he is coming from and I am impressed with the work and dedication he has to the game. For all of the hockey reasons in the world, I get it. What frustrated me, and maybe I went on too big of a tirade, is that he tries to justify his decision as doing it for his family. That bothers me and I've made that clear.
Also, what does reading an article and understanding it mean to you? Am I just supposed to say "cool story, I understand it"? Because all I see here is people making a judgment of Dupuis, positive or negative, on his decision and character.
It helps me gain perspective on people. Dupuis is the type of person that is going to fight through anything to play hockey. Is he some what dumb because of it? Yes. Is he taking a risk? Yes.
His family, organization, and doctors are supportive of his decision though. How is he in the wrong and how is it wrong if he feels like bringing a Stanley Cup home to his family justifies the stress he has put them through?
I think his main point in the article like most people who talk about the Cup is that it takes sacrifice and it takes selfishness. He wants to show that sometimes that sacrifice and selfishness is worth it, by winning a Stanley Cup, being an integral part of the Penguins if they do it, and bringing it back to his family to show them that his sacrifice and selfishness was not without purpose.
I also think it is pretty obvious that Dupuis told his family first when he lied about the clot rather than writing the original article. His spouse is obviously okay with it, as we all know any break in trust in a relationship can be a huge deal whether it be something as simple as going to the bar one night or cheating on a spouse.