Honour Over Glory
Fire Sully
- Jan 30, 2012
- 77,316
- 42,447
All of this filth flarn filth and not one mention of Pascal's bike shorts.
Shame on all of you.
Shame on all of you.
I don't care about the articles. I'm glad he did the articles. It will hopefully ensure that there is even more pressure on him to disclose any issues he has going forward.
Those two pieces of articles together would leave me terrified if I'm his wife or if I'm management of this team. He's lied about it before. If he has symptoms again during, say, game 4 of the Stanley Cup Finals, does that paragraph above give you confidence that he'd tell somebody about it? I hope you're right and he's learned his lesson. I'm sure in the front of his mind, he thinks he has. But if you asked him two years ago if he would ever hide symptoms of a re-occurrence of something like this, I'm sure he would have confidently said he'd tell the doctors immediately. And as he said it, I'm sure he'd believe it.
Should he play? That's up to him and the doctors. Should the doctors keep as close an eye on his health as possible? Absolutely they should. I would be asking him after every damn game. Also, while I think hiding it again is a real possibility, I don't know if I think he'd actually lie about it if directly asked. I sure hope not. That way if god forbid something goes wrong, you can at least know you did your due diligence.
Let's be honest though. EVERYYYYYYYYY pro hockey player would lie about his condition to play in game 4 of the Stanley Cup finals. That's just the culture of the sport.
Now, that's something we should all be worrying about. This "tough guy culture" is kinda ridiculous.
so maybe everyone should stop talking about how courageous this is
just maybe
Maybe I am naive, Jiggy. Maybe I don't know the pressure on doctors to "clear" guys to play. I guess my perspective was that early on, after the clot was discovered last year, it was clear that he was NOT coming back. He was DONE. But, with that all changing, my assumption was (again, maybe naive) that they worked on it, found a diet/medication that worked, and he ended up being cleared to play. I assumed they figured out how to mitigate chances of a future clot, through proper medication. And thus, that the risk is truly low that he'd have future clotting issues. Maybe, as you and TTEOT are saying, that is NOT the case, in all actuality...
I know next to nothing of blood clots, Jiggy. I do NOT know the seriousness, and how well they can be prevented/controlled through medication. So, I probably should not speak on this any further. I was indeed looking at this like a "setback" or "hardship" that he's fighting through, sort of like when he worked his way back from the knee injury. That's the perspective I was coming from when I said that there's a potentially good lesson there -- the idea of "when the going gets tough, you don't quit." BUT -- if this is indeed something that really CAN'T be effectively controlled medically, with any degree of certainty, then, like you, I'd say what he's doing is IMO unnecessarily risky, and he needs to "know when to say when" and do what it takes to make sure he's going to be there/alive/not incapacitated, and be the husband and father his family needs him to be...
(Sorry to hear about your father-in-law...sounds like you have been there to witness some tragic medical situations. Wow, I can't imagine him living as a "prisoner in his body" as you put it...sad...)
everyone that's played sports has played with some kind of injury. a concussion is the cut off for me. but blood clots are levels and levels above even that. there is no line to walk on in this situation, the line isn't even visible from this point
So much drama over a guy who's been medically cleared to come back actually coming back.
To be perfectly honest, I think that the criticism Dupuis is getting here is being affected in no small part by the question marks surrounding his hockey abilities at this point.
Letang and Crosby's health issues weren't as serious as Dupes', but their decision to come back was still risky as hell for their long-term quality of life and their families. Yet I don't seem to remember near the same sentiments being expressed about them.
Because they're franchise players, and we need them, and not 36 year old bottom 6ers making 3.75 mil per.
So much drama over a guy who's been medically cleared to come back actually coming back.
To be perfectly honest, I think that the criticism Dupuis is getting here is being affected in no small part by the question marks surrounding his hockey abilities at this point.
Letang and Crosby's health issues weren't as serious as Dupes', but their decision to come back was still risky as hell for their long-term quality of life and their families. Yet I don't seem to remember near the same sentiments being expressed about them.
Because they're franchise players, and we need them, and not 36 year old bottom 6ers making 3.75 mil per.
letang should also consider retiring, i agree.
So much drama over a guy who's been medically cleared to come back actually coming back.
To be perfectly honest, I think that the criticism Dupuis is getting here is being affected in no small part by the question marks surrounding his hockey abilities at this point.
Letang and Crosby's health issues weren't as serious as Dupes', but their decision to come back was still risky as hell for their long-term quality of life and their families. Yet I don't seem to remember near the same sentiments being expressed about them.
Because they're franchise players, and we need them, and not 36 year old bottom 6ers making 3.75 mil per.
Let's be honest though. EVERYYYYYYYYY pro hockey player would lie about his condition to play in game 4 of the Stanley Cup finals. That's just the culture of the sport.
Now, that's something we should all be worrying about. This "tough guy culture" is kinda ridiculous.
but most wouldn't be putting themselves in as much risk as he would be in this situation.
So much drama over a guy who's been medically cleared to come back actually coming back.
To be perfectly honest, I think that the criticism Dupuis is getting here is being affected in no small part by the question marks surrounding his hockey abilities at this point.
Letang and Crosby's health issues weren't as serious as Dupes', but their decision to come back was still risky as hell for their long-term quality of life and their families. Yet I don't seem to remember near the same sentiments being expressed about them.
Because they're franchise players, and we need them, and not 36 year old bottom 6ers making 3.75 mil per.
Letang and Crosby didn't hide symptoms and continue playing. That's a huge difference imo. I'm not saying he should retire. I'm saying he damn well better not hide this stuff again. If I was his family or the doctors who cleared him, I would be pretty damn nervous about him playing again. And its not because he has a very high chance of developing another problem. Its because if he does develop another problem, I don't trust that he'll deal with it properly.
Letang and Crosby didn't hide symptoms and continue playing. That's a huge difference imo. I'm not saying he should retire. I'm saying he damn well better not hide this stuff again. If I was his family or the doctors who cleared him, I would be pretty damn nervous about him playing again. And its not because he has a very high chance of developing another problem. Its because if he does develop another problem, I don't trust that he'll deal with it properly.
no one can make a definitive statement about crosby because a significant number of his symptoms weren't even concussion related