1. It's funny how many of the bunnies can't comprehend that distinction. BTW, how does Jokinen 'look' when Malkin and Neal aren't on fire?
2. Jokinen is a far better player than Pyatt. Pyatt is the far better complement for Malkin. What's destroyed his game is that his speed is gone. Playing with Malkin and Neal is the one spot on the Pens where that weakness is mitigated. What's still good about his game is his puck retrieval skills. THAT is a boon for Malkin and a skill player.
3. Pyatt isn't a long term solution. Neither is Jokinen. Jokinen could be a solution for this team on Sid's RW OR Sutter's wing. Too bad the Pens never notice what logic dictates OR the type of winger Malkin and Neal truly need. And, when the playoffs come . . .