Because I think the situation is too complex to try to force such a simplistic view of it.Crede. Why do you disagree with those two positions?
Latest crazy not-at-all-happening headcanon, prompted by bus.
Let's say W. Karlsson's agent is playing hardball on a new contract with VGK. They look to trade him.
Unsigned Karlsson + minor prospect + conditional draft pick (1st if he resigns, 2nd or 3rd if he doesn't) for Panarin. Maybe there's some way to get Nick Suzuki coming back our way.
Do we say no? We certainly get to fix our complex about him!
Milano/Duclair-Karlsson-Atkinson
Foligno-Dubois-Bjorkstrand
Jenner-Wennberg-Anderson
Dubinsky-Nash-Milano/Duclair/Davidsson/Sedlak/Robinson
That would be a crazy top 9, for sure.
So here's a silly hypothetical that came to mind that y'all can either derisively dismiss or desperately cling to as desired...
Plenty of us here have been going on the presumption that since Panarin really wants to test free agency, that means he doesn't want to be here. That's mostly because the one generally leads to the other. But this is already an unusual situation given the way he's notified the team. So here's a hypothetical.
Let's say, when it came to coming to America, he looked at the major cities and kind of dismissed most of the rest, because he's not yet aware that the NHL = unlike the KHL - isn't Moscow, St. Pete, and Everyone Else. He plays there for a while and finds it interesting. Then he gets traded here, has a blast, and realizes just how much possibility he missed out on with all the other cities in the NHL. "If Columbus is this good... what else did I miss?"
In such a scenario, he'd be wanting to see what else is out there... but Columbus would still be on the list of possible cities. "I took a broader look this time, and decided to stay."
That would fit with all of the (admittedly very sparse) facts we presently have. Easily shaken with new data (because, again, facts are sparse), but so are all the other theories we're working with.
Thoughts?
Because I think the situation is too complex to try to force such a simplistic view of it.
First off, getting a season worth of Panarin is not "nothing." It has (immense) value. Now, whether or not you feel that value outweighs the real (not potential) package that we can get for him comes down to personal valuation of team success this season versus what you think we are going to get for him.
Second, GM's don't think like we would on these boards. To an outsider, letting someone go for nothing in return, particularly an important player, seems like all loss. However, teams put differing amounts of value into things like opening up cap space, maintaining roster cohesion, etc.
Third, no two player-team situations are the same. For instance: The Jackets situation with Panarin is very different from the Islanders situation with Tavares. For one, Tavares had been with that organization for almost a decade as opposed to Panarin who has been with the franchise for just over a year. Two, the Islanders had failed to make the playoffs leading up to Tavares leaving and the team wasn't really close. The Jackets meanwhile have been very successful. In fact, Jarmo's post-season interviews indicate that the players and management are convinced that they're much better than they showed this season. What worked and didn't work for the Islanders has relatively little bearing on the Jackets. Had Tavares stayed, that doesn't mean Panarin is more or less likely to stay next season.
Guys, I'm sure Columbus IS an awesome city. He's gone.
huh?As far as Panarin, he's already won the Cup and he's still pretty young.
Shifting the discussion a bit, I find it interesting that he doesn't want to be seen as a pariah in Columbus.
That's nice but I'm going to boo anyone who makes the team worse either directly or indirectly. If his decision to leave makes the team worse, boooooooo....
Will the Jackets every get a star player who is also a leader and makes the team his?
You just described Seth Jones.
huh?
I don't know; maybe we can look after the entire FO was reorganized, with something other than multiple head coaches ago, and after back to back playoff appearances? Do I really have to have this conversation? We are a completely different franchise than we were.
If you can't see how Carter isn't even a relevant conversation I don't really know what to tell you. He wouldn't have been happy with well over half of the franchises out there. Yes, the entire world was wondering why Foote went back to the franchise that he spent most of his life (no ****ing duh).
I'm sorry you've now "triggered" me. This is just asinine. There isn't any comparison with those cases. ****.
Seems to me that both Panarin and Bob are gone. On the positive side we'll very quickly end up with a massive amount of cap space. The FO is gonna have to spin up the marketing engine to try to convince us fans that we have the bricks to complete the job. I started to write a Jarmo rant but didn't want to inflame the masses . I 'll just say that if this goes down the way it looks like it will the seat is going to get very hot for Jarmo and Davidson in their contract year.I don't see any reason to trade Bob unless you get a good offer. Goalies don't have much of a trade market. Even if we're looking to move on from him (which I don't think is set in stone) unless we're out of it at the deadline we should just keep him for this year.
I guess it's possible but the Russian article, Portzline article and the Dispatch article were posted a few hours from each other using much of the same quotes. I don't think Jarmo and Milstein talk enough for them to engage in conversations every day. Plus, all of this information was reportedly given to Jarmo at the Monday meeting so none of it was a surprise in all likelihood.
As mentioned prior, Foote , Carter, our franchise was a joke at that point. That sounds not the case anymore, and 99% of players would have no problem going to a team that was a cup contender. Once we actually break thru in the playoffs Columbus will be seen as a destination , that is a legitimate place you can go, and win the cup."Triggered you" -- oh, the horror.
Foote (MacLean)
Carter / Nash (Howson)
Panarin / Cole (Jarmo)
Yes, every single one of these players has "excuses" for moving on -- "Carter was Carter," "no-****ing-duh Foote back to Colorado," Nash was tired of losing, Panarin wants a beach, and who knows why Cole took a reported lower offer to go to Colorado -- I guess it was the mountains. If they didn't have an excuse they would have signed and or not requested a trade out.
And here's your no-****ing-duh newsflash for the day -- the ones that did resign also have excuses for staying here, however this topic was not about those that chose to stay.
Do I think the Jackets will survive as a franchise, of course. Do I think players will sign here in the future, yes.
You stated there is no evidence of players wanting out and I clearly pointed there out there IS --under every regime that's been here regardless of coach or state of the franchise. And for the majority -- these are the major building blocks, faces of the franchise types. And now Bob is standing in the batter's box.
You can choose to ignore it but I guarantee all of these situations have been discussed behind closed doors. It would be naive to not consider each case and what can be done better to attract/retain top talent. Because quite frankly, especially in this Panarin case, and somewhat to your point, the franchise has never been in a better state yet it's still not good enough. That IS cause for concern.
Viqsi headcanon confirmedI agree 100% with Zhitnik as you translated him. We are obviously missing a piece of the puzzle with Panarin because, as all have seem to agreed besides Portzline, Panarin's statements do not add up.
Enjoys teammates and coach.
Very competitive and young team.
Team is willing to offer max years and tons of money.
Does not love city but doesn't hate it.
Therefore I am leaving...?
Proof is in the pudding though. He won’t negotiate with the jackets , yet he wants it resolved prior to camp. He doesn’t want to be here , and wants a sign and trade , or he will play out season , and walk for nothing . So whether it’s the city , coach , we will never know . He’s trying to have it both ways , so the fans don’t hate him , bottom line , he doesn’t want to be here , or he would handle things differently . I want to despise him , but then I look at how this team is constructed , great regular season goalie , elite defenseman , and absolute no help for him at the forward position . Why Jarmo hasn’t balanced out this team , is beyond me . Panarin may look at this team totally different if we were to ship off a talented defenseman, not jones , to Toronto , for a player like Nylander . Or we made a move to aquire Duchene from Ottawa . Someone that actually has a skill set that can keep up with Panarin . Yet , it appears that Jarmo wants to go into this season praying that Pld doesn’t have a sophomore slump , and can man the first line , and that Wennberg will develop some type of compete level , and be a legitimate #2 center . Maybe Panarin is as skeptical as most here are .I agree 100% with Zhitnik as you translated him. We are obviously missing a piece of the puzzle with Panarin because, as all have seem to agreed besides Portzline, Panarin's statements do not add up.
Enjoys teammates and coach.
Very competitive and young team.
Team is willing to offer max years and tons of money.
Does not love city but doesn't hate it.
Therefore I am leaving...?
Proof is in the pudding though. He won’t negotiate with the jackets , yet he wants it resolved prior to camp. He doesn’t want to be here , and wants a sign and trade , or he will play out season , and walk for nothing . So whether it’s the city , coach , we will never know . He’s trying to have it both ways , so the fans don’t hate him , bottom line , he doesn’t want to be here , or he would handle things differently . I want to despise him , but then I look at how this team is constructed , great regular season goalie , elite defenseman , and absolute no help for him at the forward position .
Why Jarmo hasn’t balanced out this team , is beyond me . Panarin may look at this team totally different if we were to ship off a talented defenseman, not jones , to Toronto , for a player like Nylander . Or we made a move to aquire Duchene from Ottawa . Someone that actually has a skill set that can keep up with Panarin . Yet , it appears that Jarmo wants to go into this season praying that Pld doesn’t have a sophomore slump , and can man the first line , and that Wennberg will develop some type of compete level , and be a legitimate #2 center . Maybe Panarin is as skeptical as most here are .