cslebn
80 forever
- Feb 15, 2012
- 2,712
- 1,273
So Panarin isn't joining the Kings yet? What a chump. Hurry up.
Looking for the good old formula of Kings trade with Jackets = Cup Win?
So Panarin isn't joining the Kings yet? What a chump. Hurry up.
Looking for the good old formula of Kings trade with Jackets = Cup Win?
Jay Zawaski is right there with him, IMOAfter reading some of the comments today, one thing that needs to be reiterated to non Hawks fans is that Scott powers is the Blackhawks most credible reporter by a landslide
When he does chime in his track record is good but powers is definitely more tapped in to what's going on with all aspects of the organization. Also the only reporter who legitimately keeps up with prospects overseasJay Zawaski is right there with him, IMO
Scott Powers also wants people to pay for a subscription.After reading some of the comments today, one thing that needs to be reiterated to non Hawks fans is that Scott powers is the Blackhawks most credible reporter by a landslide
Maybe it’s just wishful thinking but if Panarin and Kaner have been discussing his return I’d think it’s a pretty high likelihood of happening. They had great chemistry and obviously a relationship that transcended the ice and language barrier.
That said, Stan Bo’s decision to bring him home is a huge factor. Despite being able to pull it off for around 9-10 mil per he could very likely say they need a top 4 D man instead of another scorer. He probably wouldn’t be wrong either as lovely as it would be bringing Panarin back.
They looked like pure magic together, but I'd argue that Panarin is able to deploy far more of his gifts when he's the primary puck carrier on a line, similar to Kane's role. They can't both do that on the same line. If the Hawks reacquire him they ought to give him his own line.
Maybe Schmaltz, but not DeBrincat. Either way, I just don’t see it as being any more likely than any other destination given the logistics.
Seabrooks contract is a straight up cap killer.
No good team could trade for him and why would he waive for a bottom team?
Lol what a horrifyingly bad offer. That Murphy contract is a killer, especially for a team that would deploy him as the #6 D.I read from one Finnish article that Friedmann has told in Vancouver radio show that Bowman has offered 1st 2019, Murphy and Joker for Panarin.
Anyone who listens TSN Vancouver?
Lol what a horrifyingly bad offer. That Murphy contract is a killer, especially for a team that would deploy him as the #6 D.
This is a horrifyingly bad take.Lol what a horrifyingly bad offer. That Murphy contract is a killer, especially for a team that would deploy him as the #6 D.
No it isn’t. Murphy is a worse defenseman than all of Werenski, Jones, Savard, Murray, and Nutivaara. He’s got a huge cap hit for what would be a 6th defenseman on our team. Why would we want to tie up a substantial amount of cap space there at the loss of offensive firepower? The 1st would be a non-lottery pick and the prospect is good.This is a horrifyingly bad take.
This is a horrifyingly bad take.
Lol what a horrifyingly bad offer. That Murphy contract is a killer, especially for a team that would deploy him as the #6 D.
Here's why it's a bad offer. It's bad because the players (their quality notwithstanding) returning are at a position of strength for Columbus, while they'd be trading away easily the best forward in a group that it otherwise considered of decent quality but lacking explosiveness. It just doesn't help enough where the team needs help is all. The pick is enticing of course, but suffers because of the rest of the offer.
Just wondering... who are the Hawks trading to get Panarin and signed? My guess is Debrincat and/or Schmaltz aren't in this theoretical lineup if they were to acquire Panarin.in a hyothetical lineup I wonder if Panarin and DeBrincat would go well together on a "3rd line" could possibly be great for Cats development to learn from Panarin
Saad-Toews-Dylan Sikura
Kahun-Schmaltz-Kane
Panarin-generic 3C-Debrincat
So Columbus has a very good, deep defense and is moving a top line forward for a 1st and two more defensemen? I have no issue with Murphy or Joker but unless they move Savard for a top 6 forward this would be a big fail by Jarmo in my opinion. Granted you can always flip assets to fill needs but this is not a good offer (fit wise) for Columbus. Hawks lose a good young forward or I don't think there is a deal.I read from one Finnish article that Friedmann has told in Vancouver radio show that Bowman has offered 1st 2019, Murphy and Joker for Panarin.
Anyone who listens TSN Vancouver?