Just FYI: Brett Hull had his own lockout and a half "The half" being in the middle of his peak/prime. The full season was, of course, already past it.
the main purpose is to score more goals than your opponent
He would not score that much when he was 18-19 first of.
Also without the first lock out, there might never have been a crackdown on obstructions, and then we have a whole other scenario of potential years of low scoring to deal with.
So maybe we'd do better ignoring the what ifs?
Using his career .61 goals per game rate and assuming he played in 112/116 games the lockout removed (again matching the 97% career mark for games played), would give him an extra 68 goals, to bring his career total to 760, just behind Jagr for 3rd all time.
The Butterfly Effect makes this all irrelevant. It’s impossible to predict. It’s not as simple as saying he missed out on 120 or so extra games and thus another 70 or so goals.
He could have more goals, he could have less, he could have been injured, he might have won a Cup earlier, he might be out of the league by now, everything little thing would change.
Agreed. Ifs and buts and on pace for this and that are meaningless.
For me, I am happy the way things turned out.
Definitely. 692 goals and counting and not having to worry about the laughable argument that he’s not an all time great due to lacking a Cup and Conn Smythe has to be one of the better possibilities that could have turned out.
Ha-ha. His compass exactly points north. Do you know that Russia is located in north?A compass that does not point north is broken. Moral compass is no different. If it's off, it's off.
Northeast from where I live.Ha-ha. His compass exactly points north. Do you know that Russia is located in north?
Moral compass is the same. He loves his country and his new home. Nothing wrong with this. He respects his teammates. What bad did he do?Northeast from where I live.
I was talking about his moral compass.
Did you intentionally miss the specifics of my post?Moral compass is the same. He loves his country and his new home. Nothing wrong with this.
You were talking about the moral compass. I say that Ovi's any compass is OK. What do you want to hear from me?Did you intentionally miss the specifics of my post?
This is true.
Could also be argued that if Jagr didnt get homesick and leave the NHL for 3 years he'd have had a shot as well - plus the aforementioned lockouts costing him.
I love how people use the "best goal scorer" qualifier on Ovechkin as though it is somehow a negative. Ya know, Messi is only a goal scorer.
It's as if it's not the stat by which the winner of games is determined?!? Some people act as though other players are like... "ya know... I could score more goals than Ovechkin, but nah, I'd rather spend my time doing other stuff..."
There is literally no other current player capable of doing what he has done. You could also make the case that there never has been... and yet somehow being the best at the most important skill in Hockey is somehow spun as a negative... SMH
It seems butterfly effect only applies to Ovy. In case of Gretzky/Lemieux/Crosby, they would clearly score much more if wanted or stayed healthy.The Butterfly Effect makes this all irrelevant. It’s impossible to predict. It’s not as simple as saying he missed out on 120 or so extra games and thus another 70 or so goals.
He could have more goals, he could have less, he could have been injured, he might have won a Cup earlier, he might be out of the league by now, everything little thing would change.
He is still playing like a shadow of himself but still putting up 50. If that isn’t greatness then I don’t know what is.Hard to believe many were saying this guy was done 5-6 years ago and should be traded when he was playing like a shadow of himself. Safe to saw Barry no neck trotz has saved this guys career.
Yep. That's right. To the RMNB they're gladly giving injuries and even early retirement; to Crosby who is an injury prone machine they are stretching 22 games PPG to entire career. So weird.It seems butterfly effect only applies to Ovy. In case of Gretzky/Lemieux/Crosby, they would clearly score much more if wanted or stayed healthy.
What? No way..I would take Malkin over OV
Datz and Bure too.
You could not lose with anyone of the three . Personal preference I suppose.What? No way..
no three lock outs (cancelled season) and he is right back in second.Jagr has said himself that without those years in KHL, he would have retired years ago. So no KHL=no all time second in points.