Our KHL

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vicente

Registered User
Jun 6, 2012
1,525
0
Cologne
Malmö would definitely be the team to join from Sweden. They are struggling to stay alive and has no real possibility of getting promoted to SHL anytime too soon.

Would KHL be able to fund like, a huge majority of Malmös budget if they joined? They are in pretty bad shape financially.

KHL would help them to find sponsors and they would do a lot to promote such a project to make it financially stable in the future.

A team in Malmö also would open the Danish market to KHL and the one in Northern Germany as it would be more likely that people from Hamburg go to a Malmö game than to one of Munich (far closer distance).
 

Vicente

Registered User
Jun 6, 2012
1,525
0
Cologne
I can say one thing - it is not coincidence that Red Bulls joined MHL. Look, MHL and KHL has at least one common person - Alexander Medvedev. It was reported that he talked to Dietrich Mateschitz about joining KHL .... no deal was done, but Red Bulls joined MHL. I can see MHL as 1st stage. Off course, time will tell.

It would be irony to have Red Bull Salzburg/Munchen in KHL. When I looked at 1st edition of ET, there were Jokerit, Sparta and Salzburg. The last two as sole club from national league. Finals of ET is called Red Bulls. Irony. Main "stones" of ET have been brought by KHL :sarcasm: Sparta´s owner is in KHL, Jokerit on the way, Salzurg in talks (??). Someone said, if you can not beat your opponent, try to buy him. :sarcasm:

Look Red Bull is one of the biggest sponsors in the world of sports and it is no coincidence that they bought EHC München this year. Before hockey in Munich was almost dead and now there are plans to build a 14,000 arena in Munich for EHC Red Bull München (ice hockey/DEL) + FC Bayern München (basketball/BBL).

Red Bull failed multiple times to join DEL because Germans didn't want foreign teams in their league and Salzburg is too small to have a KHL team and they only have a very small arena.

For Salzburg another advantage is that Munich is only 140 km away so many Austrian fans could buy season tickets for possible KHL team from Red Bul Munich.

PS:

Another advantage for Munich in KHL is that EHC München has almost no DEL history (they played in 2. Bundesliga until a few years ago). And there are teams like Löwen Frankfurt, Dresdner Eislöwen etc who could easily jump in to get a DEL spot to substitute them. As they currently play in a weak stadium nobody really would miss them (as a DEL franchise).

And most top players from Germany come from Bavaria where they have most hockey teams and fans. If I was KHL I would get a franchise there. :D
 

vorky

@vorkywh24
Jan 23, 2010
11,413
1,272
Look Red Bull is one of the biggest sponsors in the world of sports and it is no coincidence that they bought EHC München this year. Before hockey in Munich was almost dead and now there are plans to build a 14,000 arena in Munich for EHC Red Bull München (ice hockey/DEL) + FC Bayern München (basketball/BBL).

Red Bull failed multiple times to join DEL because Germans didn't want foreign teams in their league and Salzburg is too small to have a KHL team and they only have a very small arena.

For Salzburg another advantage is that Munich is only 140 km away so many Austrian fans could buy season tickets for possible KHL team from Red Bul Munich.

PS:

Another advantage for Munich in KHL is that EHC München has almost no DEL history (they played in 2. Bundesliga until a few years ago). And there are teams like Löwen Frankfurt, Dresdner Eislöwen etc who could easily jump in to get a DEL spot to substitute them. As they currently play in a weak stadium nobody really would miss them (as a DEL franchise).

And most top players from Germany come from Bavaria where they have most hockey teams and fans. If I was KHL I would get a franchise there. :D

I like what you wrote :D

Yes, there is many pros for Red Bull Munchen joining KHL. It seems that DEL would not have so much problem with it (not a case of Adler or other traditional DEL club).

Part about new arena is very important. Can Russian build it? :amazed:

I would not be suprised if KHL had a plan with Munchen/Red Bull or so. It is definitelly not a coincidence, why does Red Bull Salzburg/Munchen need MHL team if there was not something "more" in the air?


Jonimaus
As Vicente said, money is not a problem. Does KHL want and need Malmo? That is important to know.
 

Jonimaus

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
3,005
27
Lund
Jonimaus
As Vicente said, money is not a problem. Does KHL want and need Malmo? That is important to know.

Malmö is a football town. The football team gets 80% of the attention of the media there. It has a great arena, but it's not huge, but that's because Sweden is a low populated country, so what's the point of adding huge arenas?

If KHL wants to add a swedish team, it will be either a team in the 2nd division, a team in SHL that every year is close to being relegated, and/or a team with terrible economy.

Malmö would probably be the best bet since it has been a rather long time since they was anything to count on in SHL, and has now been dwelling for several years in SHL-2.
 

Sucro

Rhymesayers Fanboy
May 11, 2013
628
0
Vienna
My Ultimate KHL:
European League:

Western conference:
Berlin
Hannover
Hamburg Freezers
Kölner Haie
London
Manchester
Paris
Amsterdam

SC Bern
ZSC Lions
Genève-Servette HC
HC Davos
Adler Mannheim
Grenoble
Bolzano Foxes
Milan

Eastern conference:
Sparta
Slavia
Vítkovice Steel
Kometa Brno
Pardubice
Slovan
Košice
Cracovia

Vienna Capitals
EC KAC
HC TWK Innsbruck
Medvescak
Olimpija
Budapest
Partizan
Dinamo Minsk (<- for Lukashenko's sake)

Nordic League:

Western conference:
Färjestad
AIK Stockholm
Leksands
Brynäs
Linköpings
Djurgårdens
Södertälje
Karlskoga

HV71
Malmö Redhawks
Frölunda Indians
VÃ¥lerenga
Stavanger Oilers
Storhamar Dragons
Herning Blue Fox
Copenhagen

Eastern conference:
TPS
JYP
Kärpät
Ässät
Lukko
Modo
Luleå
Skellefteå AIK

Ilves
Tappara
Jokerit
HIFK
Espoo Blues
HPK
Karjala Petroskoi
Tallinna Kalev

Eurasian League:

Western conference:
SKA
CSKA
Lokomotiv
Spartak
Severstal
Torpedo NN
Dinamo Riga
Yunost Minsk

Dynamo Moscow
Atlant
Lada
Samara
Donbass
Kiev
Kuban
Sochi

Eastern conference:
Ak Bars
Salavat Yulaev
Traktor
MMg
SaryArka
Avtomobilist
Molot-Prikamye
Rubin

Sibir
Avangard
Krasnoyarsk
Torpedo UK
Yermak
Amur
Satiama
Sapporo
 

Jonimaus

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
3,005
27
Lund
I like the idea, but with so many teams, if there would be any parity between the teams, the hockey would be worse than SHL is today. Too watered down. If it was doable, I'd be 100% for it.
 

Jokeri

Registered User
Jul 1, 2013
100
1
When they change the name of Gagarin cup?
I know he went to space and all... but really? what a f%&k???
 

doctorgreg

Registered User
Feb 11, 2013
38
0
Belarus
When they change the name of Gagarin cup?
I know he went to space and all... but really? what a f%&k???

I hope they will never change it. And, come on, he was the first human being in space. I think it is a very epic name for any cup.
 

Jokeri

Registered User
Jul 1, 2013
100
1
I understand he is a hero for Russians or ex-Soviet people and i respect him aswell,but did he give a cup for KHL?:) or was he a big hockey person?(i really dont know,was he?) i didnt mean to be rude or make him less important person, i just dont get a point in this context.
Mikhailov or kharlamov or even Gazprom:laugh:cup suits much better IMO
 

QnebO

Wheel, snipe, celly
Feb 11, 2010
9,763
644
I understand he is a hero for Russians or ex-Soviet people and i respect him aswell,but did he give a cup for KHL?:) or was he a big hockey person?(i really dont know,was he?) i didnt mean to be rude or make him less important person, i just dont get a point in this context.
Mikhailov or kharlamov or even Gazprom:laugh:cup suits much better IMO

Stalin Cup? :laugh: Maybe fetisov or some other international hockey legend would be better than Gagarin, but I dont care, couldn't it be just "The Cup" of KHL.
 

Babula

Registered User
May 31, 2012
1,746
70
You must be kidding. Stalin played hockey ? As I know, he played hard, but different games.
 

swosh

Im pink hair niггa
Jul 3, 2013
512
0
Prague
I like these sci-fi topic. 32 teams are ideal nums for league. How many teams do u image in play off. 16 is maximum for 4 winning system.
64 seems fair but...it is socialist. Huge diffs between club. Something like in football. No chance for play off for decades. And how is enjoyable for SKA fans to beat worse team than Kuznya?
64 means a few clubs from all country. No traditional derby and very costly away games. I would like more inter division games. Lev vs Slovan was a highlights of KHL (for Slovakia), but 9-8k away fans is record in hockey i guess.
I just know only hockey scene in Czechia. I would show possibilities of expansion only for CZE. I think Lev is relatively successful project thanks lock out. They had mainly visitors of moderate fans of other clubs from central Bohemia (Sparta, Slavia, Kladno, Litoměřice, Beroun), teens and hockey tourist and expert...and atmosphere was like in a Cathedral. Hard fans of big "S" really hate Lev. Antirussian sentiment still lives, but shrinks in times. Owners bought HC Sparta so i hope they promote it.
As a Troyan virus, project Lev is success, but it depends on will of russian sponsors.

From my point of view candidates in Czechia are Sparta, Pardubice (often sold-out, 10k arena), Brno (always sold-out, reco arena 7k), Ostrava (new arena 10k), Pilsen (city in good economic condition, 7k arena), Slavia (17k arena). In 32 teams alternative 2 clubs is max. In 64 variant 5 clubs is max.
 
Last edited:

Ivan94

Registered User
Jun 1, 2013
532
0
Germany
My KHL:

I think 48 teams is a good option. Not to big league(64) and more space for non-russian teams.


Western Conference:

Northern/Scandinavian Division:

2 teams from Finnland
2 teams from Sweden
1 team from Denmark
1 team from Norway

Western Division:

2 teams from Germany
2 teams from Swiss
1 team from France
1 team from Poland

Southern Division:

1 team from Italy
1 team from Austria
1 team from Croatia
1 team from Slovenia
1 team from Hungary
1 team from Serbia

Eastern/Central Division:

2 teams from Czech Republic
2 teams from Slovakia
1 team from Latvia
1 team from Ukraine

Eastern Conference:

21 teams from Russia
2 teams from Kazakhstan
1 teams from Belarus

or

19 teams from Russia
1 teams from Kazakhstan
1 teams from Belarus
1 teams from Japan
1 teams from Korea
1 teams from China



4 Inter-Division Games (10 home; 10 away) 25%
2 Inter-Conference Games (18 home; 18 away) 45%
1 game against the other Conference (12 home; 12 away) 30%
_________
80 games
 
Last edited:

Sucro

Rhymesayers Fanboy
May 11, 2013
628
0
Vienna
20110415_gagarin_hockey.jpg


On the topic, I think SKA, 2 Moscow teams, Loko and Minsk are to stay in the Western Conference no matter what
 

Babula

Registered User
May 31, 2012
1,746
70
I like these sci-fi topic. 32 teams are ideal nums for league. How many teams do u image in play off. 16 is maximum for 4 winning system.
64 seems fair but...it is socialist. Huge diffs between club. Something like in football. No chance for play off for decades. And how is enjoyable for SKA fans to beat worse team than Kuznya?
64 means a few clubs from all country. No traditional derby and very costly away games. I would like more inter division games. Lev vs Slovan was a highlights of KHL (for Slovakia), but 9-8k away fans is record in hockey i guess.
I just know only hockey scene in Czechia. I would show possibilities of expansion only for CZE. I think Lev is relatively successful project thanks lock out. They had mainly visitors of moderate fans of other clubs from central Bohemia (Sparta, Slavia, Kladno, Litoměřice, Beroun), teens and hockey tourist and expert...and atmosphere was like in a Cathedral. Hard fans of big "S" really hate Lev. Antirussian sentiment still lives, but shrinks in times. Owners bought HC Sparta so i hope they promote it.
As a Troyan virus, project Lev is success, but it depends on will of russian sponsors.

From my point of view candidates in Czechia are Sparta, Pardubice (often sold-out, 10k arena), Brno (always sold-out, old arena 7k), Ostrava (new arena 10k), Pilsen (city in good economic condition, 7k arena), Slavia (17k arena). In 32 teams alternative 2 clubs is max. In 64 variant 5 clubs is max.

You know our pool, sir. What about Liberec ? (better arena than Pilsen) What do you think ? Too close to Prague, or so ?
 

swosh

Im pink hair niггa
Jul 3, 2013
512
0
Prague

Babula

Registered User
May 31, 2012
1,746
70
It is sci-fi so ok. Add Liberec. It is just fun. But i wanted choose only few cities with visible advantege

For Liberec plays little support from the richest czech. http://zpravy.idnes.cz/kellner-sest...maci.aspx?c=A100908_132004_liberec-zpravy_alh

And againts is: there is no airport like in Pardubice and big growing companies like in Pilsen

Yup, I like it also. Kellner factor is really huge. How many Slavia football fans dreaming about him. I'd say all of them and I understand that. I'm not a woman, but I'm thinking about him really often also :) May be... one day in future, we will know more. He is our Rothenberg...

edit - And good to know about economic growth of Pilsen, city of culture...
 

Dominus

Registered User
Nov 5, 2004
1,245
0
When they change the name of Gagarin cup?
I know he went to space and all... but really? what a f%&k???

Not that it really matters what the trophy is called, but I like "Gagarin cup". At least that's a name that everyone recognizes anywhere in the world, and it's not bound to just russian hockey. Also "Gagarin Cup" sounds better than "Kharlamov Cup", for example. Stalin Cup vs. Stanley Cup would be awesome though :laugh:

Finnish song "To childhood hero" from -86. "Fly on Juri Gagarin".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad