OMG and 1967 It should come as no surprise that I completely disagree with you both. DiPietro is the last thing you need on this team. He is a goalie that will demand to be in all the games. Vancouver wants him to play every game. You are then in my mind telling Andreee thanks for what you did but sorry kid we don't have faith in you.
Is that the message you want to send to him then write him off as a goalie and trade him. because he is not going to be happy and is not going to develop if you do that.
Andree so far has stood n his head to give the team great goaltending and is not that far in stats than the GOD Dipietro. The players n the team have confidence in him and play their ass off in front of him.
You talk about chemistry but in the next breathe you want to screw it up.
We need a back up pure and simple we need a goalie that can go into the nets and the team feel confident. Cranley needs to go to the CCHL and get some game experience for next year. The move of Cranley will not screw up the chemistry it will add to it if they find the right player to platoon with Andree during the run.
Please stop saying that the only opton is Dipietro or infer that he is the only option for this team.
There are other goalies out there that would be IMNSHO a much better fit Vilardi, Raymaker, are 2 and there are others.
Dipietro will not be a platoon goalie. Vancouver will not allow it and he will not want it.
Let's put the extra we would save on him and get a player that can fit into the 3rd line and make it a scoring/shutdown line for this team.
We essentially have a chance of trading for PAtrick Roy in his prime. The Avalanche had a lot of regular season success but lacked the clutch goaltending in the playoffs. Roy was the player they needed to get them over the top. The Ottawa 67s are somewhat in the same boat. We have solid defense and offense but an unproven goaltender. No offense to Andree but loads of goalies go on hot streaks. We are essentially only 1/3 of the way through the season. We have ZERO OHL Track Record on Andree to suggest he will continue this pace for a whole season plus 20+ playoff games.
You say there is basically no difference in statistics right now. I beg to differ. Andree is arguably playing in front of the best defense in the league right now. He is sporting a 2.66 and a .905%. DiPietro is playing in front of a very average defense and is getting hardly any goal support and is sporting a 2.23 and a .925%. If we were to simply add the difference of those two stats to what Andree is doing it would be a goalie with a 3.09 and a .885%. That goalie would be someone more like Mack Guzda in OS. So the difference right now between Andree and DiPietro stats wise is the same as the difference between Andree and Guzda. That’s a pretty big frickin’ difference. Andree in Windsor wouldn’t have the stats he has now let alone anything close to DiPietro. So, let’s be at least a little more respectful to DiPietro and stop calling him a GOD sarcastically.
As of right now, I don’t see one goalie available other than DiPietro. I doubt London trades Raymaakers. Unless SSM trails off, I doubt they make Villata available. Outside of those guys, who may be available the would be anything other than a clear backup? If we acquire a clear backup, we may as well just keep Cranley and ride Andree to death.
I am of the opinion that players should play for the crest on the front of their jersey not for the crest on the back. I am pretty sure that Andree wouldn’t be overly upset losing his starting job to a player of the calibre of DiPietro. DiPietro is also a great player for Andree to learn from. Just think of all the stuff he could share with Andree. His experience in the MEmorial Cup and on the World Stage in the WJHC and his experience in an NHL camp. How to deal with heightened expectations etc. Just the soft skills DiPietro could pass on is valuable for Andree’s development. He’d be that much better prepared next year as a 19 year old.
Let’s shift gears a little and compare the idea that Andree would be pissy and sulk with adding a stud OA centre to the team. Theoretically, Rossi is the # centre because he has the top two wingers in Keating and Felhaber. Let’s assume that Chmelevski keeps Clark and Bitten as his wingers. That leaves the new OA centre with Clarke and Quinn. Right now I would suggest Clarke and Quinn are the better two wingers compared to Bitten and Clark. If that centre is someone high profile, that line would have to be considered the #2 line. My opinion anyway. That would suggest Chmelevski is relegated to the 3rd line centre role. WIll he sulk and be pissy for his diminished role because we acquired an additional player that takes his ice time away? Or, will he relish the fact his team is much improved and work harder to win games? The rest of the team would be unhappy to acquire a World stage goalie? I doubt that. I think they would be over the Moon with that acquisition.
I am assuming that DiPietro is in fact on the trade block after the WJHC. I am also assuming his cost would be pretty much just draft picks and wouldn’t cost one of the young guns we currently have.
I am fine with either Raymaakers or Villata as OA’s in a platoon situation as well, especially if the cost is much cheaper but I just don’t think either are really available. First, if London really thinks Ottawa is the team to beat, they are in no way going to make them stronger. They will trade Raymaakers to a team they are more confident in not having to face in the playoffs.
Ingham is a 200 born and Missy has been on a good run so he won’t be available. No way Keyser is traded from Oshawa. Dillon is also in a good situation in Niagara. Jones in Peterborough is in the same boat as Ingham. We clearly cannot trade for an Import.
MAybe Propp in North Bay but he’s had such a poor season and they reached back to get him so I doubt they trade him again.
So, at this point, if Ottawa wants a goalie, even as a competent platoon guy, I just don’t see one available right now. I doubt one will become available either.