Oh man, I am so tired if reading this ****...
Why does some random poster named Johnny Canucker get to decide what is relevant? In this case, on this topic, I find it is relevant to me that while I read two posters exchange views on a player, one expresses his perspective, so you know what, that makes it relevant. You choose to suggest something someone says is irrelevant to YOU, but that most certainly does not define something as irrelevant.
As a parallel, I find your post, and others from you, rather condescending (my opinion- therefore, I respond to it this time). Unfortunately, mine is only one voice, one opinion, so my perspective does not define each of your posts as condescending, it just simply shares with you my perspective that the tone of them bothers me.
As an aside, one thing I do agree with you about, he may have introduced a different argument or an additional one than he was making earlier. Oh well, this would be his right, to represent his argument. It may be that he continues to hold onto his belief that it hurts to think negatively about everything, and he chooses to look at the positive possibility of Juolevi becoming a top 4 defensemen- which this team clearly needs!
Now to Juolevi.... At this point, I would be very very happy if he became a top 4, play in all situations, useful D for this team for many years to come. I would be a little disappointed that the hope for the upside of a pick this high did not reach its ceiling and become a game changer, but I would also be very happy that we got a really useful player out of the pick rather than a Michael Dal Cole type (or the dozens of other players at this approx draft position that didn't become as useful). I still have doubt that OJ becomes this, but I have hope. Hope is a really good thing for me in my life. I even hope you can find some in yours