FanOfSadTeam
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2010
- 9,428
- 9,830
McDavid is "good" at 5v5?
Statistically, compared to his peers, he had one of the best 5v5 seasons of the last 25 years.
He can’t be that great, he never draws any penalties.Further to this: The most 5v5 points since 1996. Only Jaromir Jagr (x2) and Henrik Sedin (in his hart winning supernova season) had more than 80 EVS points in a season in the last 20 years. Crosby's never done it. Malkin has never done it. Ovechkin has never done it.
He's the best 5v5 forward in the NHL by a lot.
The problem with hoping the team struggles for a coaching change is that there is zero guarantee that the next coach will be any better. So are you going to just keep hoping for terrible teams? You must’ve been in your glory for about a decade.
He can’t be that great, he never draws any penalties.
He's clearly not like Eakins, Eakins had a badger up his butt and never smiled.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Eakins time here turned him into an alcoholic. He looked like one at the end.Yeah, and instead of going out for beers to salvage a season, Eakins would have insisted on soy milk power smoothies instead.
Doubt it, he just looked like he'd lost his understanding of reality. Though, that's probably because he seemed to assume he was just going to re-invent the NHL.I wouldn’t be surprised if Eakins time here turned him into an alcoholic. He looked like one at the end.
Eakins was likely that guy on HFOil who had all those long rambling complex technical manifestos on new wave stats and schemes and how they would/could change the NHL once they were implemented... remember that guy?
I kind of miss the novels by New Age System haha.
I kind of miss the novels by New Age System haha.
I don't know that it was that high, but I know it had a significant bump down the stretch.Really can't remember where, but I read somewhere that our PK finished 2nd or 3rd in a stretch towards the end of the year.
Anyone else hear this?
I really can't remember what I was reading yesterday evening, to even try find that article again.I don't know that it was that high, but I know it had a significant bump down the stretch.
Really can't remember where, but I read somewhere that our PK finished 2nd or 3rd in a stretch towards the end of the year.
Anyone else hear this?
I really can't remember what I was reading yesterday evening, to even try find that article again.
Edit:
They were dead-last overall until the last three months when they were No.2, changing things up under Jim Johnson
From the Journal app, but it was Matheson. Plus maybe I misunderstood. Is he saying Jim Johnson is our #2?
Well he might have been forced to use different personnel, which is was likely part of the change. Letestu was gone.So maybe Johnson wasn't an issue after all on the PK?
McLellan was running it in practice, at least temporarily, at the end of December. It went 4-for-9 over the next two games (the back-to-back 5-0 home losses vs Winnipeg & Los Angeles).I guess I question why someone who actually watches the practices on a daily basis never has said this. Seems a bit odd.
If Johnson was dismissed from his PK duties that's pretty hard to hide in this city
I mean it makes sense, but seems odd. Was that around the time where TM gave it a test drive for a few practices?
Kurt Leavins, who writes for Staples' blog and was bang on about the coaching situation and new assistants, said he "knows for a fact" that the PK was taken away from Johnson at the end of January or early February.
At The Cult of Hockey: Coaching changes are imminent behind the Edmonton Oilers bench
My guess is Johnson lost the PK after it went 1-for-4 in the blowout loss vs Buffalo on January 23rd (Game #48).
With Johnson (first 48 games)
Overall: 110-for-154 (71.4%), 31st overall
At Home: 39-for-72 (54.2%), 31st overall
Without Johnson (last 34 games)
Overall: 78-for-91 (85.7%), 2nd overall
At Home: 38-for-45 (84.4%), 8th overall
I was a hater all season and was adamant that this team is a decade away from anything. To be honest, we really aren't.The PK clearly looked better to me in the 2nd half of the season but these numbers are simply stunning.
If I put myself in McLellans shoes....he has an Assistant Coach running the PK...its a problem....the AC says he will sort it out....McLellan gives him as much time as possible to do that and then ultimately he has to step in.
One could argue that he gave Johnson too much rope but at no time did TMac ever throw Johnson under the bus.
Not even when the season ended.
So lets extend this into next season. If the Oilers make no personnel changes (hopefully they do) approx how many points would an improved PK provide? Based on how many games last season the PK was direcdtly responsible for a loss I think 7-8 more wins isnt all that unreasonable.
So even with all of the defensive breakdowns....lazy play...suspect goal-tending at times...injuries...they still could have been on the cusp of a playoff spot.