Rumor: NYR having active trade talks on Zucc, Hayes, Kreider & Namestnikov
- Thread starter 5cotland
- Start date
I have felt all along someone out of left field is gonna go. Too many calls being made to not have conversations off the original topics.
rt
The Kinder, Gentler Version
Canes can't risk a lottery pick and one of their best prospects for a rental.
BUF 2nd + BUF 3rd + Roland McKeown for Hayes
MarkMessyay11
Registered User
This is right. As a Rangers fan, I'm thinking it should rightfully cost a true core piece to pry Kreider away, and any other team's fan would rightfully think it's too much. There has been enough smoke around Kreider rumors this year to make me believe there's at least a chance of him being moved, but a big deal like this typically doesn't happen during the season. My bet is any trade won't go down until the summer, if at all.
I think the re-signing rumors are just posturing. Gorton has fully committed to this rebuild and unless the return for Hayes is completely insignificant, I think he gets shipped out. I don't think Names at $4 mil for another year is actually a detriment. I think that's about par for the course for a mid-tier winger now. Not saying they'll get a huge haul for him, but I think a trade is likely if the Rangers are motivated to move him.
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
Fox and a protected pick doesn't sniff Kreider. That offer for Hayes is brutal as well.
Kcb12345
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2017
- 29,510
- 22,867
Ace Card Bedard
Back in Black, Red, and White
- Feb 11, 2012
- 8,780
- 3,629
- Nov 2, 2011
- 7,657
- 7,598
If anyone thinks their team is getting Kreider for anything short of a gross overpayment then they are sorely mistaken
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
Crease
Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
- Jul 12, 2004
- 24,108
- 25,587
I think it’s more
Kreider>>>Hayes>>>Zucc>>>>>>Names
Kreider is much higher than Hayes because he’s a better player and an extra year term.
Hayes is worth significantly more over Zucc because he’s the better player, age, and Hayes plays Center.
Clayonator
Registered User
BoldNewLettuce
Esquire
eco's bones
Registered User
The Rangers might try to keep Hayes if they don't think they're getting a good enough return. That said the term for Kevin is going to be at least 6 years and it's going to be probably in the $6 mil per ballpark. He'll get that in the summer. He's an underrated player.
So Hayes might stay but I agree with you that Zucc is getting moved. That said--it wouldn't surprise me if the Rangers signed both him and McQuaid in the summer--so I don't necessarily see Zucc as a goner.
I’m not sure Hayes is worth that much more than Zuc. I think most contenders are probably looking at Hayes as a 3C but could be looking at Zuc as a top 6 upgrade.
I don’t see Kreider being moved.
As far as the others, With Namesntikov’s hot play as of late would try to sell high on him now. Zucc and Hayes are pretty much inevitable at this point.
EdJovanovski
#RempeForCalder
- Nov 2, 2011
- 7,657
- 7,598
Puljujarvi is closer to Namestnikov's value than Kreider's
For some reason I think Nashville takes a big stab at kreider. I can see them heavying up on that playing style they like to bring come playoffs .
WhoTagz
Registered User
Would you trade that for JT Miller?
Since 15-16
Kreider 535 hits, 89 goals, 130 even strength points and 176 points
Miller 479 hits, 76 goals, 143 even points and 189 points.
You get more hits and goals from Kreider but more production from Miller. Miller is two years younger and signed long term at a good caphit while Kreider is a UFA after next season. Miller can also play center and can play up and down the lineup and produce. When on the Rangers together Miller the last 3 seasons either had the same amount of points or more points than Kreider.
