PatrikBerglund
Registered User
- May 29, 2017
- 4,628
- 2,654
The Rangers have zero need for bottom-four LHD, and Nylander is not a particularly attractive piece. That's a bad deal for NY.
Which makes it perfect for Buffalo.
The Rangers have zero need for bottom-four LHD, and Nylander is not a particularly attractive piece. That's a bad deal for NY.
That's good, because Rangers don't need Barrie. They need guys who can defend.LMAO. Avs dont move Barrie straight up for Hayes.
This is awful
Doesnt Ottawa own your 2nd???I could see the Sharks doing something like 2nd + someone like Gambrell for Zucc.
Try Vaak, Studnicka, Fredric, 2019#1 and a conditional 2020 #1.
Doesnt Ottawa own your 2nd???
We also get a 2nd should EK sign with the sharks,that can become a 1st should you guys sign EK and reach the finals...Its complicated so I had to reread it lolOttawa owns whichever is the better of the Panthers' 2nd (which we own) and our 2nd. I think we know which one that is probably going to be. For legal purposes, we might need to trade Ottawa a 7th in 2047 or something to remove the conditional and just give them the Panthers' pick straight up. (Dorion gets paid extra for a pick he's already getting anyway? He'd do that for a size upgrade at Starbucks, much less a pick). But we have 2 2nds for the next draft, and only 1 has already been traded.
We also get a 2nd should EK sign with the sharks,that can become a 1st should you guys sign EK and reach the finals...Its complicated so I had to reread it lol
He said Chris Kreider not an in his prime Wayne Gretzky.
Over react much? The McD portion of the trade last year was Howden, Hajek, 2018 #1 and a conditional 2019 #1. Names and Miller were a wash.
The Boston prospects listed are not ground breaking. May be 1 (Vaak) is barely in the top 50 prospects currently. Drop Studnicka or Fredric.
I also said, as many others have said, it would take a overpayment for the Rangers to trade him. Their own GM came out and said they need a foundational piece back. None of those prospects are.