SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 52,489
- 34,231
so who forced you too reply multiple times to my post ?
I fixed the problem.
so who forced you too reply multiple times to my post ?
not neccesarily , Mathews for example knows the Leafs will match so if -and i'm not saying he wants to- he wants to squeeze for every last cent then hoping he gets an offer sheet is the best way to do that
not neccesarily , Mathews for example knows the Leafs will match so if -and i'm not saying he wants to- he wants to squeeze for every last cent then hoping he gets an offer sheet is the best way to do that
I think that's my point, I can't see it getting to that at all. Nothing that has happened to this point suggests anything other then the Big 3 will be here a long time, from either the management side or the players themselves. Of course I can see some hardball being played - hence someone like Nylander is not signed yet, but I can't see it ever getting to the 'offer sheet' level because from anything we've seen so far, the player wants to be here as much as the team wants them to be here. And as some others have already mentioned, this is extremely uncommon practice. So I just believe we're worrying about some extremely unlikely hypothetical here. Matthews, Nylander, Marner will be leafs for a long long time man!!
signing all 3 isn't a problem and never has beenI think that's my point, I can't see it getting to that at all. Nothing that has happened to this point suggests anything other then the Big 3 will be here a long time, from either the management side or the players themselves. Of course I can see some hardball being played - hence someone like Nylander is not signed yet, but I can't see it ever getting to the 'offer sheet' level because from anything we've seen so far, the player wants to be here as much as the team wants them to be here. And as some others have already mentioned, this is extremely uncommon practice. So I just believe we're worrying about some extremely unlikely hypothetical here. Matthews, Nylander, Marner will be leafs for a long long time man!!
If Nylander is not signed to a LT deal of 6 or > years, and only a 2 year bridge than it will cost the Leafs more cap $ in the long run.
If Matthews and Marner are not extended this year, before they break out offensively, than they will cost the Leafs more AAV and cap including the potential of matching OS from other teams.
All eyes are on Dubas to see how he handles his first big resigning challenges, and how cup competitive the Leafs become or remain will be critical to these 3 players next contracts.
AM nor MM will not become an RFA. They will not get an offer sheet. Dubas will get it done.
Go watch the Dubas interview with Bob Mckenzie.
Everyone, take a deep breath....
slowly and steadily I am thinking that if we bridge Willy and Matthews/Marner don't sign until next summer we are going to lose Marner or Nylander in 3 to 4 years from now.
We would not be able to make the cap work. Even if we traded Kadri to make room for Nylander 2 years from now it would still be very hard as Dermott and other RFAs would need raises and then you have Freddie and Rielly contracts coming too....
he said the talks are continuing and he doesn't expect them to sign the contracts at least until the season starts. And if the players were willing to negotiate the contract during season leafs would do it.
That did not say that he will get it done.
not saying he won't jsut saying thats not what he said
Wouldn't be so sure!!!
I can see Matthews and Marner being lifetime Leafs. Not so much Nylander. The time will come that the needs elsewhere will mean he needs to go.
signing all 3 isn't a problem and never has been
the problem lies in how do you sign all 3 and still have cap left ove to sign the rest of your ufa's rfa's next year so you don't have to go bottom feeding to fill out your roster
next off season
Mathews
Marner
Gardiner
and if these 3 play well they'll want to get paid as well albeit not in the same range as our top kids
Kappy
Jonnson
Dermott
so while i'm sure they'd all like to be back they also know there's only so much cap space available and in the case of Willie and Mitch depending on how they progress the situation may come when we have to deal one for cap relief or help elsewhere
and how many people thought Nylander wouldn't sign be signed by now or that M&M would both be unsigned ?
but yea we can all ram our heads up our butts and just believe all 3 have already signed sweetheart deals and the team just wants to wait until the first day of camp to make a big splashy announcement (hoping i'm proved wrong and this is true)
not neccesarily , Mathews for example knows the Leafs will match so if -and i'm not saying he wants to- he wants to squeeze for every last cent then hoping he gets an offer sheet is the best way to do that
it's all cute until someone does it and if you don't believe teams try to lock up franchise players for a reason before they can be offer sheeted then that's a very cute opinion you have
There was a lot of talk about the Leafs giving Tavares a one year max to lure him to Toronto and use the cap space they have this year. Obviously they didn’t do that, but why don’t the do it for Nylander?
Give him as much as they can fit this year with an understanding that next summer the additional money he got this year comes off his long term deal. Say 10 this year and then 6x5.75 next summer, assuming he has a similar season.
Leafs save cap space long term and Nylander gets more money upfront. The league probably won’t like it but NFL teams do similar things every year by restructuring contracts.
Thoughts?