BertCorbeau
F*ck cancer - RIP Fugu and Buffaloed
Last thread was way past full.
I was referring to myself, when you question what he should get it appears you are bashing Nylander. Kid is awesome, with a lot more upside, but he isn't in the drivers seat with this contract and I still try to squeeze every penny I can, it's business."I meant bashing Nylander, sorry if I confused. 6.5 is my top number, hoping for 6."
@DarkKnight
Oh I've been the opposite for Nylander. I've been trying to defend him throughout the first thread. I think most sensible people appreciate what he brings and how much more he can grow.
My main issue were people suggesting he shouldn't make more than 7% of the cap hit for next season. that's 5.5m in a 79.5m cap.
Distraction? I'm hoping they start squeezing Marner and Matthews right afterI do believe management has had a slow, relaxed approach to this as Dubas said earlier in the summer however I also think within the coming weeks both sides will step up and agree to get a deal hammered out just as training camp starts.
I think Dubas is smart enough to not want that as a distraction heading into the season and I imagine Nylander will just want to get it sorted out so he can focus on getting prepared.
I agree , hard ball all 3 of the kids and if they give the team a hard time trade them all . We don't need them now that we've signed JT who proved he can win all by himself .Hard ball him to a fair number or trade. No overpayments
That might actually be the worst case scenario. Pay for none of his UFA years and have to sign him along with Matthews and Marner in the same year.1 year 5.5
Such silliness.I agree , hard ball all 3 of the kids and if they give the team a hard time trade them all . We don't need them now that we've signed JT who proved he can win all by himself .
That might actually be the worst case scenario. Pay for none of his UFA years and have to sign him along with Matthews and Marner in the same year.
That might actually be the worst case scenario. Pay for none of his UFA years and have to sign him along with Matthews and Marner in the same year.
im pretty sure he was being facetious , if not god help us all lolSuch silliness.
practically every young comparable player has signed for under 6.5mil on 5 - 7 year deals, im not sure why nylander would be asking for close to 8. and what marner makes in the future has nothing to do with william's current numbers so i dont see how that is relevantI don't think he signs long term for under 7.75 since Marner will probably get 8 or more after playing a year on such a stacked team. Marner could crack 85 points.
1 x 6.5 is what I expect to see at this point then he can have one more year to compare himself to Marner.
Does it make sense to sign long term right after your team signs one of the best players in the league without playing even a single season on this newly improved team? Your comparison isn't the same as what has happened here and his agent knows it. He doesn't have to play on the same line as Tavares in order for his stats to increase. Teams will be overwhelmed.practically every young comparable player has signed for under 6.5mil on 5 - 7 year deals, im not sure why nylander would be asking for close to 8. and what marner makes in the future has nothing to do with william's current numbers so i dont see how that is relevant
UFAs and RFAs are completely different things, when nylander hits UFA status he's free to ask for whatever he wishes and sign for and sign with the highest bidder. and yes, it always makes more sense to sign a longer term contract due to the the uncertain nature of injuries etc. based on your logic, wouldnt larkin then look at tavares contract as well before signing for 6.1mil, since he plays JT's position and had better numbers than willy last year isnt he worth 8 at least? a better comparison is mcdavid and draistle and edmonton messed that one up. you get paid based off of your own production and to a lesser extent what the league wide market value dictates based off of similar players in the same age group with the same contract status.Does it make sense to sign long term right after your team signs one of the best players in the league without playing even a single season on this newly improved team? Your comparison isn't the same as what has happened here and his agent knows it. He doesn't have to play on the same line as Tavares in order for his stats to increase. Teams will be overwhelmed.
I would allow my stats to be pumped up for a year or two as well before signing long term.
You missed my point entirely. The potential impact that the Tavares signing could have on Nylander's numbers is very substantial. Could be a 25% increase or more. He might want to sign for one year to bet on himself like Karlsson did in LV.UFAs and RFAs are completely different things, when nylander hits UFA status he's free to ask for whatever he wishes and sign for and sign with the highest bidder. and yes, it always makes more sense to sign a longer term contract due to the the uncertain nature of injuries etc. based on your logic, wouldnt larkin then look at tavares contract as well before signing for 6.1mil, since he plays JT's position and had better numbers than willy last year isnt he worth 8 at least? a better comparison is mcdavid and draistle and edmonton messed that one up. you get paid based off of your own production and to a lesser extent what the league wide market value dictates based off of similar players in the same age group with the same contract status.