Confirmed with Link: Nylander changing his number to #88 and received WC Best Man Award

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zizzzzy

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
2,005
1,484
You literally used Mario. You did that. If you are making a case for your views the logical thing would be to use comparable examples to validate your point, so when you through out a GOAT, you are comparing the players. :dunno:

That and I am sure Nylander was MORE than up to speed to compete against year 2000 NHL players.....
 

egd27

Donec nunc annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
16,827
12,559
GTA
or 3 in first 9 games.

And 28 in 41 gp. That pace is the lowest of his career, even lower than his rookie season.

True, but also still better than 27 in 54 gp and 38 years old vs 22 years old
 

kindalaidback

숨 참고 LOVE DIVE
Nov 24, 2017
870
642
NYC
I'll never understand how everyone is so certain that Nylander and Matthews will play together. We spend 2/3 of last season + the playoffs begging Babcock to play one of our best playmakers with our best shooter. But Babcock stubbornly refused.

We lost this season the moment Dubois decided to keep Babcock.

to be fair, william said he doesn't know if he'll be with matthews because he and babcock did not talk about any line combinations. at all.
Nylander said he spoke with coach Mike Babcock last week but said the subject of line combinations never came up. He said he hopes to be reunited with center Auston Matthews.

"Of course," he said. "We've had great chemistry in the past and we've been able to find each other out there. I feel I'm ready to have a huge step in my NHL career, so I think we'd do just fine together."

Nylander ready to 'dominate' for Maple Leafs this season

they've played together almost their entire nhl career-- if william had been in camp, they would've played together from day 1. and given his comments that he isn't expecting to play center (babcock probably mentioned it when he and william had their little chat last week) , i think it's more than likely that he and matthews will end up playing together.
 

saltming

Fan Addict
Oct 6, 2015
19,045
7,060
Other
I think you've lost the original plot.

How is it that guys can be out for 6-8 weeks with an injury that limits their ability to train, and return to the line up and start contributing almost immediately?

Putting aside the skill gap, do you think Hyman will take 4-6 weeks to get back to his form if he misses camp and the first month of the season due to the surgery? What about Dermott?


Can't use Hyman as an example of a returning player............not as skilled
Cant' use Lemieux as an example of a returning player..........far too skilled

O'Reilly? Ok.....but Nylander out pointed him by 7 in his 54 games (O'Reilly played 29) so I should rethink my stance. :laugh:

Here's the point as clearly as I believe I can make it.

O'Reilly returned to the line up after holding out and not playing an NHL game for approximately 11 months and put up 8 points in his first 10 games.

Nylander returned to the line up after holding out and not playing an NHL game for approximately 8 months and took 24 games to put up 8 points (2 in his first 10)

The point - There are examples of players returning to the line up after long layoffs and contributing right away........Nylander did not do so.

Things I wasn't saying:
Hyman and Nylander are similar players
Lemieux and Nylander are similar players
O'Reilly outpointed Nylander in his holdout year
I don't have a horse in this race, but I will say if you are just going to look at the first 10 games upon returning, it seems like a very small focus and with that thought I would think it would be better to use the players complete stats, so advanced stats too, to compare the impact the player had when first returning to the game.
 

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,005
28,061
Toronto, ON
Do you know who Nylander’s most common linemate was last season?

I would suspect it's Kadri, Marleau, Brown, and so on? He only had two stints with Matthews. Right after coming back -- and that was admittedly bad. Then there was a small stretch of games toward the end of the season with AJ and Matthews. They were dominant in terms of possession but Babushcock quickly changed it up for no good reason.
 

egd27

Donec nunc annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
16,827
12,559
GTA
I don't have a horse in this race, but I will say if you are just going to look at the first 10 games upon returning, it seems like a very small focus and with that thought I would think it would be better to use the players complete stats, so advanced stats too, to compare the impact the player had when first returning to the game.

But again.........the premise was about contributing almost immediately after an extended absence.

Anyway, I believe I've spent enough time on this so Nylander came back from his hold out and was just fine. Everyone takes 10 - 15 games to round into their old form, he was just unlucky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garthinater

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,005
28,061
Toronto, ON
The fact they played together for Matthews first two seasons, then again when Nylander came back for his third, might have something to do with it....it’s like people forget who put them together in the first place, it wasn’t fate.

Then what about last season? He refused to do it for the most part. He was being so stubborn. He's known for his stubborness and Ego.
 

MyBudJT

Registered User
Mar 5, 2018
7,429
4,576
I would suspect it's Kadri, Marleau, Brown, and so on? He only had two stints with Matthews. Right after coming back -- and that was admittedly bad. Then there was a small stretch of games toward the end of the season with AJ and Matthews. They were dominant in terms of possession but Babushcock quickly changed it up for no good reason.

His most common linemate was Matthews :nod:
 

MyBudJT

Registered User
Mar 5, 2018
7,429
4,576
Damn. But like by how many minutes? I suspect not many. Though I've been wrong before.

Oh well, at least that bodes well for Nylander and Matthews playing together this season, which is the important part.

Iirc, Kadri is a close 2nd but there is a little gap after that.
 

Mr Hockey

Toronto
May 11, 2017
11,156
3,662
I would suspect it's Kadri, Marleau, Brown, and so on? He only had two stints with Matthews. Right after coming back -- and that was admittedly bad. Then there was a small stretch of games toward the end of the season with AJ and Matthews. They were dominant in terms of possession but Babushcock quickly changed it up for no good reason.
Willie played 5-vs-5 minutes ...
  1. 270:16 - Kadri
  2. 266:16 - Matthews
  3. 239:24 - Johnsson
  4. 231:07 - Brown
  5. 225:05 - Marleau
 

saltming

Fan Addict
Oct 6, 2015
19,045
7,060
Other
But again.........the premise was about contributing almost immediately after an extended absence.

Anyway, I believe I've spent enough time on this so Nylander came back from his hold out and was just fine. Everyone takes 10 - 15 games to round into their old form, he was just unlucky.
Sure. Like I said I have no horse in the nylander debate. I was just flummoxed and the nylander lemieux comparisons is all
 

MyBudJT

Registered User
Mar 5, 2018
7,429
4,576
Willie played 5-vs-5 minutes ...
  1. 270:16 - Kadri
  2. 266:16 - Matthews
  3. 239:24 - Johnsson
  4. 231:07 - Brown
  5. 225:05 - Marleau

I'd like to see your source. Dobberhockey states a different story.

Total icetime:
Matthews: 37.9%
Kadri: 35.38%

EV ice:
Matthews: 35.92%
Kadri: 34.66%

Edit: When you look at when there are just 3 forwards too, Matthews still has Kadri beat.


I've attached my calculations.
 

Attachments

  • Line Combinations - Frozen Tools (1).csv
    9.7 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:

Mr Hockey

Toronto
May 11, 2017
11,156
3,662
I'd like to see your source. Dobberhockey states a different story.

Total icetime:
Matthews: 37.9%
Kadri: 35.38%

EV ice:
Matthews: 35.92%
Kadri: 34.66%

Edit: When you look at when there are just 3 forwards too, Matthews still has Kadri beat.


I've attached my calculations.
I just put up 5-vs-5 minutes ... if you use even-strength minutes that can include 3vs3, 4vs4 ...

Even strength minutes are ...
  1. 282:58 - Matthews
  2. 276:31 - Kadri
 

MyBudJT

Registered User
Mar 5, 2018
7,429
4,576
I just put up 5-vs-5 minutes ... if you use even-strength minutes that can include 3vs3, 4vs4 ...

Even strength minutes are ...
  1. 282:58 - Matthews
  2. 276:31 - Kadri

And what is your source?

Dobber doesn't provide 5v5, but even when you select just 3F on the ice (assuming they're all 5v5), Nylander still played more with Matthews....

Regardless, EV and total TOI is more relevant in this discussion than 5v5.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
32,368
50,128
Then what about last season? He refused to do it for the most part. He was being so stubborn. He's known for his stubborness and Ego.
He started them out together, and Willie stunk so he was off the first line. I mean, Matthews has played 70 percent of his career or more with Nylander, but apparently the coach doesn’t like them together. What? Marner Matthews he has a thing about, that’s real...last year he had every intention of having them together, context matters. And, I felt they would have played together in the playoffs if not for Kadri, Babcock said very specifically Kap and Nylander would move around against Boston, a home away consideration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garthinater

Mr Hockey

Toronto
May 11, 2017
11,156
3,662
And what is your source?

Dobber doesn't provide 5v5, but even when you select just 3F on the ice (assuming they're all 5v5), Nylander still played more with Matthews....

Regardless, EV and total TOI is more relevant in this discussion than 5v5.
natural stats site...

at all strengths, Willie played the most with Marleau and even had a better CF% than with Matthews, most likely because of QoC and Willie was in better shape...
319 - marleau
302 - matthews
302 - johnsson
283 - kadri
 

saffronleaf

Registered User
May 17, 2011
26,005
28,061
Toronto, ON
And, I felt they would have played together in the playoffs if not for Kadri, Babcock said very specifically Kap and Nylander would move around against Boston, a home away consideration.

I think Babcock just said that to save himself by throwing Kadri under the bus. Didn't even give Matthews much ice time in game 7.
 

Mr Hockey

Toronto
May 11, 2017
11,156
3,662
I think Babcock just said that to save himself by throwing Kadri under the bus. Didn't even give Matthews much ice time in game 7.
Matthews line had a 38.10 CF% in the game 7 ...

game 7 CF% ...
  • 59.38 tavares line
  • 53.33 Willie/Marleau/brown line
  • 38.10 Matthews line and played against the Krejci line
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garthinater

MyBudJT

Registered User
Mar 5, 2018
7,429
4,576
natural stats site...

at all strengths, Willie played the most with Marleau and even had a better CF% than with Matthews, most likely because of QoC and Willie was in better shape...
319 - marleau
302 - matthews
302 - johnsson
283 - kadri

Dobber has Marleau at 37.11% and Matthews at 37.92% in All situations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad