North
Registered User
- Jun 25, 2009
- 15,697
- 13,298
Yeah that's why Gaudreau has 40 more points then Hall in the last two seasons...
Hall has actually had seasons where he was over a point per game.
Talk to me when Gaudreau does.
Yeah that's why Gaudreau has 40 more points then Hall in the last two seasons...
Im not sure in what world Hall is actually the better player. I wanted him to be, thats for darn sure, but lets face it, the Flames significantly improved thanks in large part to Gaudreau. Hall may be a fantastic individual player, but he did nothing to make the Oilers any better, we have been at the bottom for his entire career.
Travis Yost recently wrote a piece on Adam Larsson that I think many people are going to point to as "proof" of Larsson's offensive ability. Unfortunately, Yost's data and conclusions are specious.
Here's a sound breakdown of why nobody should trust Yost's analysis in this article: https://medium.com/@kenyong/is-adam...context-still-matters-a7344672385f#.z9y4ky8po
almost 3000 messages for what?
The Oil overpaid.
almost 3000 messages for what?
The Oil overpaid.
I'd say a package of RNH + Eberle + Nurse is more valuable than just Hall
Yes they probably did, New Jersey should have had to included a good prospect on top of Larsson; having said that I think it's pretty much equally true that the Oilers roster today is considerably harder to play against than the one that ended the season.
Lucic + Larsson makes them a harder team to play against than Taylor Hall. I know Chiarelli can't say it because it might be tampering, but I think he probably had a very, very good idea they were getting Lucic on top of already adding Puljujarvi who can probably play right away too.
Larsson is a young horse of a d-man who's already solid in a shut down role but has room to grow with some untapped offensive tools and was highly touted in his draft year.
I feel bad for Hall because he was a good soldier for a lot of years and now is being shipped off just as the McDavid era is starting and they're getting a new arena, and no offence to New Jersey but they're no lock for a playoff berth either. So I can understand him being pissed off about it, but it is a business.
Gaudreau is severely overrated on these boards.
Oilers needed Larsson more than they needed Hall. Larsson is underrated, has room to grow offensively and is on a good contract. Obviously the Oilers weren't going to get a stud dman like Pietrangelo, Doughty or OEL for Hall.
Yeah, a draft pick could've helped even it out, but sometimes you just go for it and try to make up what you lost. I think Chia did this with Lucic.
At the end of the day the Oilers are a better team and for that I think Chia has had a positive offseason thus far.
The analytics crowd is completely full of ****. They use team and group measures and try to pin that to individuals which is completely misleading bull ****.
I thought these fools would have died off with the epic failure of the Eakins/Dellow era in Edmonton but, they continue to beat their heads against the wall.
I wouldn't say the analytics crowd is full of ****, but I think right now it's really easy for people to just throw junk out there and have fans that aren't quite so engaged take it at face value.
There's tons of good analysis out there, it's just a shame the guys with high profile national platforms are kind of ruining it for everybody else.
Hall has actually had seasons where he was over a point per game.
Talk to me when Gaudreau does.
OT, but, am I losing my mind or is your avatar winking at me???
If your position was that the Oilers would have an opportunity to actually get an equal value D in trade for a W, then I agree with you. But this entire board kept telling us that trading a W for D would result in a 'lesser' D coming back... and most of us didn't disagree... and that's what we got.
I think the expectation was that only Hall would get us a #2D with upside/age/pedigree on his side. That if it was Nuge it would be a current #3/#4 who still had top pairing upside. And if it were Drai, it was probably somewhere in between.
NJD fans are saying Larsson is a #2D already with potential for more... maybe. And most others (incl many cautious Oiler fans) are saying he's more of a 2nd pairing guy with an outside shot at a #2. Those two positions are not that irreconcilable... and it should be obvious that Chia sides with NJD fans, or rather, feels that the first move MUST happen this summer (ALL oiler fans agreed on this) and that this was the best of the available options.
And on that, I tend to agree... I think you are missing the point on Weber & Subban. It should be obvious to you, that based on the earlier rumors this week (some combination of Hall, Drai or #4 AND Klefbom or Nurse) there was no way MTL would trade Subban without a solid D coming back. NSH was probably in the same category and so their needs ALIGNED.
I'm a huge Hall fan... thought he is under-rated, still do... but I would much rather a #2D with pedigree on a solid contract for Hall.... than I would trading THREE solid assets including a solid D in order to get one better D back. That's not the type of trade that would propel this team forward... and given the systematic "loser-stink" depression surrounding all of our assets, such a trade has an even greater potential to backfire.
A one for one suits me fine... Neither Weber nor PK were coming 1for1.
Travis Yost recently wrote a piece on Adam Larsson that I think many people are going to point to as "proof" of Larsson's offensive ability. Unfortunately, Yost's data and conclusions are specious.
Here's a sound breakdown of why nobody should trust Yost's analysis in this article: https://medium.com/@kenyong/is-adam...context-still-matters-a7344672385f#.z9y4ky8po
The analytics crowd is completely full of ****. They use team and group measures and try to pin that to individuals which is completely misleading bull ****.
I thought these fools would have died off with the epic failure of the Eakins/Dellow era in Edmonton but, they continue to beat their heads against the wall.
Hey I mean that's all great, just keep repeating "Adam Larsson is a first pairing defenceman." to help you sleep at night. I did the same for half a season with Dougie Hamilton .
I don't even think the trade is that awful, Hall being the million dollar talent with a ten dollar brain. Doesn't change the fact that Chia just put his hopes for fixing a blueline that's been in disarray for 10 years on a 23 year old with a career high of 24 pts. Just kind of seems like half measures to me when a Weber or Subban were apparently on the market, ridiculous package or not. Now if he can get a Shattenkirk or Barrie back there as well I'll retract all criticism and applaud the bald moves.
I actually kind of respect Chia for taking a big swing at it with this and the Lucic signing, more than the last couple clowns did anyway.
You realize there were several threads that were basically dedicated to bashing him and calling him a bust right? If anything, he's underrated. Kid will never truly get his due because he's under 5'10 and people refuse to believe a player of his stature could ever succeed in this league.
Dumbest thing i've read here in awhile, this isn't 1985 where people still think like that. There have been lots of smaller players who have succeed in the league, don't starrt that pity party junk.
You realize there were several threads that were basically dedicated to bashing him and calling him a bust right? If anything, he's underrated. Kid will never truly get his due because he's under 5'10 and people refuse to believe a player of his stature could ever succeed in this league.