That's my opinion. Fans don't want to give Green credit. Prior you said something about Green not utilizing the kids well, but seems like all the kids are playing offensive minutes and are a big part of the teams success.
You can act like I haven't been part of the discussion, but I've already posted about your claim of "usage" or being benched, and then some, if you actually take the time to see what I posted the other day. I'm not going to keep saying the same things over and over again. I've already posted why I think Green benchs Goldobin. Yet you ignore my point by saying, "Green doesn't need to play Goldobin in the bottom 6 for the first point to hold".
It actually seems like this post I'm replying to is running on emotion. I'm just pointing out an opinion of mine and of other posters on this board that think there are posters who don't want to give Green credit. I'm not taking it personally. But this last post you made, it seems like you are taking it personally. I respect your opinions but this opinion of Green having some sort of vendetta against Goldobin is wrong.
So, please don't undermine my posts by saying they run on emotion or that they aren't addressing your points because just because it may feel like I'm calling you out, doesn't mean that haven't.
Your posts on Goldobin come across as emotional. Here's the tell: The crux of your argument is my perceived bias against Green. That is a pre-existing perception you have of my posts going into this conversation about Goldobin. You confirm this by referencing my earlier posts about Green "not utilizing the kids well". That's your take going in before I have said one word about Goldobin. Fair or unfair?
When in fact, I have shown my methodology as to why Green is wrong here by isolating his method with Goldobin. As in, I am working back from his usage, not forward with bias. You don't see this.
I'll take this a step further: Here were your initial distinct points:
- It's mind numbing some on here cannot see the difference in his play pre and post sitting out.
- It must be hard for people to see things when they're so married to ideas from 2 years ago. (another tell)
- Just blame Goldobin's IQ on Green too. (one more)
- It's not like Green is sticking a young offensive kid on a line with Beagle. (irrelevant point)
- I'm looking for a reason to call Green out...
Have I listed your main points correctly?
Three of those points do not argue in good faith. That's you seeing a perceived slight against Green and jumping to his defense. That's emotion.
On the points themselves:
You don't need to repeat them because I know them (assuming you verify the bullet list I posted). You think that because Green gives Goldobin offensive minutes when he plays him that this is enough to satisfy usage, I don't. I see a coach that jumps to bench Goldobin first, above all others. I see a coach that tries to make an example of Goldobin by scratching him for 4 consecutive games. Schaller has a similar case. Only, one is an offensive producer on a bottom11 GF/GP team, and the other is no-scoring mucker. Both are fringe, but I'm seeing a preference by Green here in terms of style.
What do you think?