Konstantinov brought the thunder and lightning with his hits.I think Stevens is clearly cemented as the hardest hitter of all time, I wonder if Kronwall has an argument for second all time though. On defense the only guy I can think of people might argue ahead of him is Rob Blake. Maybe some argue a Marchment or Kasparitus type but I dont think they hit as hard as Kronwall. Forwards are harder to compare but maybeWendel Clark is ahead of him? Maybe Cam Neely?
Kronwall has to be up there, harder to compare with forwards though
I think Stevens is clearly cemented as the hardest hitter of all time, I wonder if Kronwall has an argument for second all time though. On defense the only guy I can think of people might argue ahead of him is Rob Blake. Maybe some argue a Marchment or Kasparitus type but I dont think they hit as hard as Kronwall. Forwards are harder to compare but maybeWendel Clark is ahead of him? Maybe Cam Neely?
Kronwall has to be up there, harder to compare with forwards though
I think Stevens is clearly cemented as the hardest hitter of all time, I wonder if Kronwall has an argument for second all time though. On defense the only guy I can think of people might argue ahead of him is Rob Blake. Maybe some argue a Marchment or Kasparitus type but I dont think they hit as hard as Kronwall. Forwards are harder to compare but maybeWendel Clark is ahead of him? Maybe Cam Neely?
Kronwall has to be up there, harder to compare with forwards though
Konstantinov brought the thunder and lightning with his hits.
Kronwall is up there. Also would put Chara & Pronger up there, maybe above him.
Those guys were definitely more physical and stronger in the corners/out front of the net but they were never really huge hitters in the same way Kronwall was. I would definitely have Kronwall above them as an open ice hitter but they were overall tougher dmen than he was
I've seen Kronwall vilified for his hits. Konstantinov. Kasparitis. Ulf Samuelsson. All called various forms of dirty. But Scott Stevens is just held up as some paragon of hard hitting hockey and it's total crap. The guy targeted player's heads. Yeah, it wasn't technically illegal at the time, but it was dirty. And it was far worse and more consistent than anything these other guys did. Rant over but it's easy to seem like a big hitter when you routinely hit guys in the head.
I've seen Kronwall vilified for his hits. Konstantinov. Kasparitis. Ulf Samuelsson. All called various forms of dirty. But Scott Stevens is just held up as some paragon of hard hitting hockey and it's total crap. The guy targeted player's heads. Yeah, it wasn't technically illegal at the time, but it was dirty. And it was far worse and more consistent than anything these other guys did. Rant over but it's easy to seem like a big hitter when you routinely hit guys in the head.
If you watch Stevens highlight reel, he actually doesnt hit the head as much as everyone lets on. His hit on Lindros was a head shot and his hit on Kariya was late (I think) but for the ridiculous amount of big hits he has its hard to find a lot that are just targetting the head. Is there plenty with head contact? Yeah, but also full body contact. Kronwall did the same thing plenty, full body contact that starts with the head because the puck carriers have their heads down. His hit on Voracek was exactly what I'm describing here and 100% clean (and shouldnt be taken out of the game).
On top of that, its ridiculous to judge players for playing within the rules of the time. Stevens was never suspended for a hit he made and Kronwall was once. Given the absurd amount of insanely huge hits in both their highlight reels the one suspension is a pretty crazy stat
Fighting for hits has always been a stupid hockey tradition.
I would prefer dirty hits are punished more severly than rely on players to get "retribution" or "own up" to a hit they made regardless of it being clean.
You get hit clean, you get up if you aren't hurt. You make a hit, you play more hockey.
Kronwall was challenged just as much for clean hits.Well, the case can be made that fighting is a stupid tradition period.
Or that hitting in the head is a stupid tradition.
But when you sees your teammate reaching for a poorly passed puck, trying to make sure he gets the puck out of your zone, and the guy from the other team sees his head down and comes skating in and plows your teammate in the chin/nose and leaves your teammate convulsing on the ice - if you don't feel like killing that mother****er, I'm not sure what kind of teammate you are.
Hockey is a violent, emotional game.
But it's less violent and less emotional than it was 10 years ago.
And even less so than 20-30 years ago.
Kronwall was challenged just as much for clean hits.
That's the thing, the idea is that if you knock a guy flat on the ice, clean or not, you are supposed to answer the bell. I find that to be silly. I understand why players want to get retribution if they think the hit was cheap or predatory. But I don't think the guy doing the hit has to respond to it, necessarily. And I don't think there is anything wrong with that.
Also in what way do you believe the Voracek hit to be illegal by today's rules?
I'm friends with a guy who was Stevens' defensive partner for awhile in Washington. They purposely funneled the puck carrier into the Washington zone, and often hid Stevens and had him pop out from behind a guy to surprise him. He didn't give a **** about headshots. Nobody did.
Puck carriers skate with their heads out front of their bodies.
Open ice hits means head shots.
As for the Voracek hit, it's illegal all day and all night in today's game.
Fighting for hits has always been a stupid hockey tradition.
I would prefer dirty hits are punished more severly than rely on players to get "retribution" or "own up" to a hit they made regardless of it being clean.
You get hit clean, you get up if you aren't hurt. You make a hit, you play more hockey.