Once again I'm the lone voice against trading Paul especially for another skilled one dimensional soft player who has yet to prove anything at the professional level. Ottawa needs all of the things Paul brings, size, grit, face offs, good defensively, some scoring, special teams & hard to play against. I'd do Wikstrand for Drouin one malcontent for another or the best defenceman not playing in the NHL for the best forward not playing in the NHL. lol
Not sure I count as a relative newbie, but I'm there with you. Clearly getting chided for it up above.
Two things for me.
The first is that I see Drouin as more of a natural centre than a winger, particularly when considering Murray's preferences. And I believe that Paul is a good back-up plan if Z-bane cannot take the next step and lock down the 1C as he is really the only physically imposing centre prospect in the organization. I see White as Turris' replacement (~2 years away) with Lazar as essentially an ideal third line centre and Pageau/Dzingle vying for the fourth line. Chlapik is about 3 years away and offers a good contingency plan. So, the Sens are strong up the middle other than the lack of a true 1C.
The second is the optics. Trading for Kyle was one thing, and it turned out to be a good trade, but at some point you become risk averse as a GM. Where's the real benefit to this trade? Is Drouin a superstar in the making? I certainly do not believe so. He is one dimensional, and the Sens have placed a great deal of emphasis on having two-way forwards, and the staff has been chided by the fan-base for the methods they have used to drive home that point (ice-time for certain players).
They have good talent in the system without the outside credit deserved. I see no reason in trading some of those players for a hope and a prayer.