So the Ice Hogs are owned by the city.
(1) How is the city doing financially? ACCORDING TO THEIR
LATEST AVAILABLE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (2018), THE CITY IS DOING RELATIVELY WELL.
(2) How do citizens feel about this ownership? I mean citizens, not really fans. TOUGH TO JUDGE FROM THE OUTSIDE. I COULDN'T FIND ANY WEB REPORTS OF RECENT PUBLIC OBJECTIONS TO THE CITY OWNING THE ICEHOGS, THOUGH THE ORIGINAL FRANCHISE PURCHASE IN 2007 REPORTEDLY DID STIR UP SOME CONTROVERSY. MAYBE FORUMS MEMBERS WHO LIVE IN OR NEAR ROCKFORD CAN CHIME IN WITH LOCAL INTEL. ROCKFORD NEWSPAPER REPORTS OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS INDICATE THAT THE REVENUE BROUGHT TO THE CITY BY THE ICEHOGS IS A KEY ELEMENT TO THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT & SUSTAINMENT OF THE ROCKFORD DOWNTOWN AREA; SO THAT'S A CHECK IN THE "PROS" COLUMN FOR THE CITY HOLDING ON TO THE TEAM.
(3) How does the city feel about whatever demands the Blackhawks might make upon it to improve the arena? THE
LAST SIGNIFICANT UPGRADE PROJECT FOR BMO HARRIS BANK CENTER IN ROCKFORD WAS IN 2013. I COULD FIND NO WEB EVIDENCE OF THOSE RENOVATIONS BEING DEMANDED BY THE BLACKHAWKS, AND THE COMPLETION WAS NEARLY 3 YEARS IN ADVANCE OF THE BLACKHAWKS SIGNING A 5-YEAR AFFILIATION EXTENSION WITH THE ICEHOGS. SINCE THE HAWKS ARE NOT FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROCKFORD AHL TEAM OPS (BEYOND THEIR PORTION OF CONTRACTED PLAYER SALARIES), I WOULD THINK THE NHL TEAM'S DEMANDS WOULD STILL BE MET BY THE 2013 UPGRADES. BUT WITH THE AFFILIATION EXTENSION EXPIRING AT THE END OF NEXT SEASON, THERE MAY BE FURTHER PRESSURE ON THE CITY TO DO MORE TO THE ARENA TO SATISFY THE HAWKS' LATEST WISHES FOR THEIR PROSPECTS.
Points worth pursuing. That makes Rockford an odd team in a different situation than nearly everyone else.