If the semi-finals are going to be seeded league-wide, I’d like to see them do the same in the second round. There’s no way Caps v Pens, Boston or NYI is going to be as entertaining a product after already watching eight game series with each of them already. The idea of teams doing that twice - replicating over a quarter of their regular season - just isn’t exciting. The season-sets seem a bit muted too - the animosity and rivalry that usually accompanies Caps-Pens games has been drowned out by the mundane frequency. Things will heat up in the playoffs because it’s the playoffs, but the team-based rivalry but might not be as strong because of the repetitiveness of it all.
The current format also poses a greater-than-normal chance, I’d say, of weaker teams making it to the final four. One of Toronto or Winnipeg are all but guaranteed to make it to the semi finals, even though I’m not convinced any of the defense and goaltending-weak Canadian teams would make it past the second round in a typical year. On the other hand, Colorado and Vegas look genuinely strong, but it’s difficult to really gauge that given the relatively mediocre division they’re playing in. And only one of them can make it past round 2, anyway.
First round - divisional
Second round - league-wide reseeding
Semi-finals
Final
Yes, there would still be luck/randomness involved in the seeding, but to me that would make for a much more interesting product with at least some teams playing foes they haven’t seen in a year by round 2. Playing a team 3 times in the RS and then 4-7 times in the playoffs is a very different vibe to 8 times in the RS, 4-7 in the playoffs.
(And before anyone weighs in with the Canadian-US border issue, none of the Canadian teams have fans in arenas yet, and it isn’t clear that will be possible even by the playoffs, so them being in Canada doesn’t seem all that important. I’d prioritise good hockey series over keeping them in Canada any day.)