So wait, The owners want money to make sure they dont lose money in winnipeg.
Just like phoenix wanted and the owner they had lined up.
How is this any different? It isn't.
Now to explain in further.
If Atlanta lost 20million in a year that they averaged 15500 fans. How do you think the jets will do? Thats the stadium cap right there.
So you up ticket prices to 85 bucks a ticket, and maybe break even with the current payroll and expenses.
Then, after the team misses the playoffs after a normal meltdown, and the next year comes.
Then when the islanders come to town, it's minus 40 outside and 10000 people show up, you are doing worse then Atlanta was. Sure, offseat a full game when the oilers come into town. And you are still drawing less then the Thrashers were. Or when players don't want to come to Winnipeg.
Forget "winnipeg is growing and can support a team". Winnipeg's arena is not financially viable to hold a sportsteam, Fanbase or Not. 750,000 People that at least 400k of them have heard about hockey, or watched hockey.
But include skyrocketing living costs, and day to day costs. How is that viable?
38k Annual income for Winnipeg
42k for Atlanta
Average housing price for Atlanta : $223,876
Average for Winnipeg : $241,650
Add in the 5.5 Million population where there is roughly 2 million untapped, oblivious to the game of hockey in general and in Atlanta.
Compared to 300k in Winnipeg. It's a step back, Its several steps back. Not just for the NHL, but for hockey's growth as a sport. It's up to the NHL to grow the league in untapped markets, To make sure stable ownership is there, and not sell off teams because the league is standing with their hands behind their back for 7 years, and in the month the news of the team has to find an owner or be gone, they stand pat.