Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 21,135
- 27,581
If Johnson is available in the 7-10 range, I'm using Strome to move up. Throw in Suter/Zadorov/Teply for the hell of it.
Consider both goalies still there at #11....I can see both Dallas and Edmonton offering Hawksxectra picks to movevup to grab a goalie before Calgary grabs the remaining goalie at#12.
If only1 of Wallstedt/Cossa remains available by #11,then 3 bidders to move up...CGY,DAL,EDM..
So unless Hawkscthemselves take a goaliecat #11I expect a move down for the Hawks. The price would be higher for Edmonton since the move down would be larger than move dowbscto either tge CHY or DaL spots .
If Johnson is available in the 7-10 range, I'm using Strome to move up. Throw in Suter/Zadorov/Teply for the hell of it.
why would you not move up when every piece musto listed are not in long term plans other than maybe suter
Fantasyland proposal.
Why in the world would any of those teams that hold those picks even bother with that garbage deal?
Strome currently has no value. Stop pretending otherwise.If Johnson is available in the 7-10 range, I'm using Strome to move up. Throw in Suter/Zadorov/Teply for the hell of it.
Any of these players in NHL?Meh
The fancy dangles wont work in NHL ,, Infact alot of his offensive production was simply off the fact of how awful overall much NCAA defense is
His shot is weak and Pearson isn't well regarded in developing forwards. Infact his system allows far too much freelancing and things that simply wont work in NHL
Not sold on Johnson enough to feel we should jump up to grab him when there are better or comparable talents available when Hawks select
Also as noted why would teams drop down for what you were offering? And frankly it doesn't make sense to move Suter to simply move a couple slots in NHL draft
What teams?There's a good chance Johnson is there when Hawks pick at 11. He has low compete concerns amongst some teams scouts. Makes fancy little plays but very weak on the puck. I'd move up for Guenther or McTavish but not for Johnson.
Draft reports, while quoting scouts, never divulge what team the scout being quoted works for.What teams?
What draft reports?Draft reports, while quoting scouts, never divulge what team the scout being quoted works for.
There's a good chance Johnson is there when Hawks pick at 11. He has low compete concerns amongst some teams scouts. Makes fancy little plays but very weak on the puck. I'd move up for Guenther or McTavish but not for Johnson.
Have either of you watched Michigan games this past season? Between the Big 10 network and video, there should be plenty of examples of "low compete" or "weak on the puck". I have yet to see much of this play from Johnson and have watched at least 5 Michigan games.Draft reports, while quoting scouts, never divulge what team the scout being quoted works for.
My post was about draft reports in general.What draft reports?
It's Michigan vs Minnesota. Approximately 20 minutes of Johnson on the ice.
Please point out the low compete level and when he's weak on the puck. Then tell me where he is not.
If there is an opinion here I trust it’s Giovi’s. I’m not sure how many of you are BHZ - 300 level alums but he took a beating from the draft gurus there for loving the Seabrook pick. Others were split on Stuart, Burns or the Forward (name escapes me).My post was about draft reports in general.
I subscribe to your gutJohnson would need patience with. No doubt. My gut says he has a real chance to be there at 10/11...I have no issues if we take him as he will have at least 2 years to start putting on mass/muscle...he is in the right program to really make that jump next year as well.
Johnson would need patience with. No doubt. My gut says he has a real chance to be there at 10/11...I have no issues if we take him as he will have at least 2 years to start putting on mass/muscle...he is in the right program to really make that jump next year as well.