Speculation: New York Rangers 2015-16 Roster Building Thread Part XXV ‎- MOaR StufF HappENs NoW?!

[True Blue]

With all of pitts problems i would try to snag Malkin out of there.


Staal miller 2nd
For

Malkin 35% Retained.

Oh, my. Really? Why on Earth would the 'pens ever do this?

 

[LeetchisGod]

The Pens would never trade malkin within the division without getting a king's ransom in return.

 

[ZiGOODejad]

We don't need a change especially if two (hopefully) prospects can cement their game and out play roster players. (Skjei/Buchie) but those are two unknowns right now. Will get a better look at them hopefully but January but if not I'm fine with the team we have

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

Oh, my. Really? Why on Earth would the 'pens ever do this?

Malkin for Mikael Samuelsson, Rico Fata, Joel Bouchard, Richard Lintner and cash.

 

[Inferno]

Malkin for Mikael Samuelsson, Rico Fata, Joel Bouchard, Richard Lintner and cash.

youd have to add Lundmark...which would make it a dealbreaker imho.

 

[Igor Shestyorkin]

Pittsburgh laughs uncontrollably at that offer.

They start laughing uncontrollably because they hear rumors of it and don't even look at the phone when it rings.

 

[Filthy Dangles]

Lol Sorry PH but that offer was some **** u see on main boards from a Toronto fan.

Any talk with Pitt and NYR for Malkin would probably start with something like this

Malkin + Fleury

For

Lundqvist + McDonagh. NYR would be adding too

 

[BarbaraAlphanse]

Lol Sorry PH but that offer was some **** u see on main boards from a Toronto fan.

Any talk with Pitt and NYR for Malkin would probably start with something like this

Malkin + Fleury

For

Lundqvist + McDonagh. NYR would be adding too

Probably not. That's a hyperbole.

But absolutely going to need more than Staal + Miller.

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Lol Sorry PH but that offer was some **** u see on main boards from a Toronto fan.

Any talk with Pitt and NYR for Malkin would probably start with something like this

Malkin + Fleury

For

Lundqvist + McDonagh. NYR would be adding too

Malkin 3 years ago? Yes. But not anymore trade returns have dropped in recent years. I think we can steal him from Pitt also staal isn't as bad as people are making him to be.

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Probably not. That's a hyperbole.

But absolutely going to need more than Staal + Miller.

Thats why i added the 2nd


Its too bad we can't get a player like Molson. I think he'd be perfect in the Top6.

Molson for Staal plsss.

 

[TheTakedown]

Probably not. That's a hyperbole.

But absolutely going to need more than Staal + Miller.

Disagree. That starts with that proposed trade. It would probably be more like:

Lundqvist
McDonagh
Brassard
2nd Rounder

For

Fluery
Malkin
5th rounder

 

[BarbaraAlphanse]

Thats why i added the 2nd

I don't even want Malkin. He'd require an overpayment just because the Pens are a rival in our same division. And he's starting to accrue injuries every year. Huge pass.

I'd rather build around youth.

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Disagree. That starts with that proposed trade. It would probably be more like:

Lundqvist
McDonagh
Brassard
2nd Rounder

For

Fluery
Malkin
5th rounder

Hell no make it for Ovi and I'd think about it.

 

[Filthy Dangles]

Probably not. That's a hyperbole.

But absolutely going to need more than Staal + Miller.

Well, Pitt wanting to trade Malkin in the first place would be a HUGE red flag, let alone to a division rival who they met in the playoffs the prior 2 years.

The situation itself is hyperbolic.

As someone else said, kings ransom would be had in order for that situation to occur.

But, even in a vacuum. If you knew Evgeni Malkin would play a full 82 games and would produce points like he does, Malkin + Fleury for Lundqvist + McDonagh is actually right there in terms of value.

Malkin 3 years ago? Yes. But not anymore trade returns have dropped in recent years. I think we can steal him from Pitt also staal isn't as bad as people are making him to be.

With Malkin it's just a matter of health. If he could just find a way to play close to 82 games, he'd be a perennial threat to the scoring title. If Pitt would trade him to division rival, you'd have to think they'd have insider information about his health.

Even then, his value is still greater than staal + miller + 2nd.

 

[BarbaraAlphanse]

Disagree. That starts with that proposed trade. It would probably be more like:

Lundqvist
McDonagh
Brassard
2nd Rounder

For

Fluery
Malkin
5th rounder

Lundqvuist is generational. McDonagh alone probably comes close to landing Malkin.

You have to take into account age, contract, position.

I'd imagine McDonagh and a little would get Malkin alone. And Fleury probably doesn't even come 1/4 of the way to acquiring Henrik.

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Ok I'm going back to reality.

Staal for Hossa

 

[BarbaraAlphanse]

Ok I'm going back to reality.

Staal for Hossa

Staal for futures. You only get back fair value if you take a risk on some young guys. That's the trade-off teams make. Prove guys that may be over the hill for prospects with high upside that may never pan out.

Risk-reward works for both sides then, and nearly only then.

 

[haveandare]

I'm sure some will disagree with me but I wouldn't even be concerned with the return for Staal. Clear that money and resign Yandle with it. Anything else is gravy IMO.

 

[Raspewtin]

I'm sure some will disagree with me but I wouldn't even be concerned with the return for Staal. Clear that money and resign Yandle with it. Anything else is gravy IMO.

not alone here

 

[Stasis]

I'm sure some will disagree with me but I wouldn't even be concerned with the return for Staal. Clear that money and resign Yandle with it. Anything else is gravy IMO.

Agreed.

 

[RGY]

Yes lets trade veteran defensemen for futures when the team is looking like they will make another deep playoff run. Wise.

 

[Let Blaine Die]

Yes lets trade veteran defensemen for futures when the team is looking like they will make another deep playoff run. Wise.

Trading Staal midseason? Agreed.

Trading Staal in the offseason? Disagree.

 

[Brooklyn Ranger]

I doubt they're sending two top office guys over to watch him if they're not even considering burning a year.

That's nothing compared to trading assets for a rental IMO

While I'm sure that's a consideration, Buch's the best prospect in the organization and I'm sure they want to a) see him play in person and b) make sure he knows the Rangers are continuing to be interested in having him come over, sooner or later this year. And it's not like the Rangers are so short of funds they can't afford it--it's a tax deduction for them after all.

 

[Brooklyn Ranger]

But if Staal has been so bad over last several years, why would any team, let alone one on the rise, trade for him and then make him the #1 defenseman?

Hey, don't let the cat out of the bag! Maybe they won't notice if no one tells them.

 

[True Blue]

Malkin for Mikael Samuelsson, Rico Fata, Joel Bouchard, Richard Lintner and cash.

Don't for get the obligatory 2nd rounder.