Motown Beatdown
Need a slump buster
We'll get him back for a 1st at the 2016 trade deadline. No biggie.
Funny, and sadly probably true
We'll get him back for a 1st at the 2016 trade deadline. No biggie.
Never seen so many angry people over losing a depth player they didn't know existed 4 months ago.
My point was why should we get so upset over a guy who isn't anywhere near an impact player and will likely never will be? Neither was playing, and Holland would have rather expose him to waivers than just have him sit in the pressbox forever.
So what if more than one team did? He can play in the NHL, we all know that, but he wasn't doing much with Detroit and isn't a huge loss (if any) in the grand scheme of things. Nobody is picking him up as a top-6 guy or a guy to help with the PK or any specific skillset, because he isn't particularly adept at anything. He is just all-around good enough to play in the NHL without killing the team. We haven't needed that and he hasn't been playing as a result.
What is the big deal, here? What did we lose?
I can't think of a single prospect we lost that actually hurt us. When we lose players they almost always just disappear into the crowd of NHL players. Can you name some? (Not counting someone like Jarnkrok who was traded for a need)
We lost an asset that apparently several other teams thought enough of to claim, in a year when many teams have cap problems and trades are somewhat difficult for those reasons.
Nestrasil has no trade value. Players like him get put on waivers all the time for that reason.
I like this train of thought. I'm going to think these happy thoughts
Nestrasil has no trade value. Players like him get put on waivers all the time for that reason.
What's with the attachment over these "13th" forwards we occasionally call up? He was decent the first couple games of the season and the preseason. Didn't stand out after that and even got power play time. The guy has been waiver fodder for a long time. Now if only they would see the same in Andersson.
Nestrasil has no trade value. Players like him get put on waivers all the time for that reason.
We lost an asset that apparently several other teams thought enough of to claim, in a year when many teams have cap problems and trades are somewhat difficult for those reasons. Yes, it's great to lose cheap talent where the full upsids really known yet.
You would have said the same about Franzen, maybe Kronwall, certainly Ericsson, guys like Helm or Abby if they'd suffered a similar fate during their debuts.
^ This.
He has no trade value. I expect to see him waived again before the season is over, and I really doubt Holland and Co. would even bother putting a claim in for him.
I don't think people are really "attached" to Nestrasil so much as they are disappointed that 1) we lost a player who was probably not the least valuable player to us (see: Weiss, Cleary, Andersson), and that 2) Holland clearly didn't know the market value of his own player given the fact that multiple teams put in claims for Nestrasil.
I mean, it doesn't really help us that Nestrasil was claimed. I don't really think we lost anything either, but its not like we waived him to make room for something of value. On the other hand, Holland is reluctant to waive a $2.4M healthy scratch when a team claiming Kindl actually would help us.
A lot of teams thought they could use a guy who they didn't have to give up any assets for. Players get waived and claimed all the time. That doesn't mean they have a lot of value. Where do you think he fits in long-term? Maybe a third liner? PK duties? PP duties? Also what teams put in a claim for him? Boston? Chicago? Any cup contenders? Carolina picked him up. I'm not worried that bottom feeding teams who are looking for any way to change things up are looking to change things up with a new player who proved he isn't useless in an NHL sweater.
As for your second paragraph, no, I wouldn't have. I don't see why me thinking something of one player means I think it of every player that is coming up into the league. That's ridiculous.
What's with the attachment over these "13th" forwards we occasionally call up? He was decent the first couple games of the season and the preseason. Didn't stand out after that and even got power play time. The guy has been waiver fodder for a long time. Now if only they would see the same in Andersson.
Kyle Quincey
That took me all of 2 seconds to think of. You develop prospects to either use them, trade them. The Wings took the time and energy to develop him into an nhl player and lose him for nothing.
I don't think people are really "attached" to Nestrasil so much as they are disappointed that 1) we lost a player who was probably not the least valuable player to us (see: Weiss, Cleary, Andersson), and that 2) Holland clearly didn't know the market value of his own player given the fact that multiple teams put in claims for Nestrasil.
I mean, it doesn't really help us that Nestrasil was claimed. I don't really think we lost anything either, but its not like we waived him to make room for something of value. On the other hand, Holland is reluctant to waive a $2.4M healthy scratch when a team claiming Kindl actually would help us.
Exactly. More broadly, just because many people will take something for free doesn't mean any of them would still take it if they had to pay for it.The theory that because multiple teams put in a claim for Nestrasil means there was a market to trade him is hilarious. Teams aren't going to give up draft picks for unproven depth players.
Post quoted above yours lays out my thoughts exactly. He had more value/potential than some of what's being kept. Some of the current roster guys were consider worthless to maybe fourth line grinders who could be easily replaced, yet given some time to develop, they overachieved based on projections here.
6'2", 210 lb winger with some skill is indeed has better potential than some of what Holland is keeping instead.
Andersson is as important part of the shut-down 4th line as is Glendening and Miller. Also big factor on one of the league best penalty-kill units.
Won't understand this Andersson hate, but hey, maybe we need new scapegoats because the old ones havd been beaten to death.
The theory that because multiple teams put in a claim for Nestrasil means there was a market to trade him is hilarious. Teams aren't going to give up draft picks for unproven depth players.
I think Howard's a much bigger factor on the PK than any of the forwards, and our fourth line just doesn't wow me outside of Glendening.
Yeah, Andersson's great positioning all the time doesn't wow anybody. You can also be effective hockey player without wow-things. But he is doing right things defensively. Miller is kind of same.
Who would fit better to that 4th line than Andersson, and at same time, it would not be off and weaken the TOP3 lines? You want Cleary there?