glucker
Registered User
Seems to me you’re just here to antagonize... there’s a word for that.And now you're deciding what my opinion is for the exact same reason I just mentioned.
You really want to prove me right that badly?
Seems to me you’re just here to antagonize... there’s a word for that.And now you're deciding what my opinion is for the exact same reason I just mentioned.
You really want to prove me right that badly?
Says the guy I wasn't even talking to, then came at me telling me what my opinion was to try to get me to argue about what you wanted with you.Seems to me you’re just here to antagonize... there’s a word for that.
LaughableThe islander do have a youngster better than Matthews too!
Excellent, and last season Matthews outscored Mak by 16 in his rookie season.
Leafs hang up, laugh, buy the Avalanche and fold the team.
Good thing Quebec built you a good team.Sorry, the Avs can't hear you because our two post-1967 Stanley Cup rings are blocking our ears.
This is just stupidity in the other direction.Avs get hosed
Matthews + marner for mackinnon
He paced for 5-6 more goals and only 14 less points, with significantly less ice time and power play opportunity playing a better two way game. He's also 2 years younger. I'd be surprised if he's not better than Mackinnon within two years, seeing the superior track record in the NHL.And? Do you have anything else other than "look at his ES goal scoring"?
We'll have one or two of our own coming up. But yes, celebrate the cups that happened a long time ago from a team that wasn't even built in your citySorry, the Avs can't hear you because our two post-1967 Stanley Cup rings are blocking our ears.
And Matthews was injured this season and played a significant part of the season injured. He also played much less. Funny how that doesn't matter though eh?And that season, the Leafs scored 250 goals, the Avs scored 165. I wonder if that contributed at all to their individual point totals...
So he's gonna get considerably better because you said so. K.He paced for 5-6 more goals and only 14 less points, with significantly less ice time and power play opportunity playing a better two way game. He's also 2 years younger. I'd be surprised if he's not better than Mackinnon within two years, seeing the superior track record in the NHL.
Because he's an elite talent who's 20. Of course he's gonna get better. If you're going to be knowingly obtuse don't waste my time with this.So he's gonna get considerably better because you said so. K.
Why’s it laughable, he was a lot better than a weak Matthews this year?Laughable
So he's gonna get considerably better because you said so. K.
Good thing Quebec built you a good team.
"Of course he is"Because he's an elite talent who's 20. Of course he's gonna get better. If you're going to be knowingly obtuse don't waste my time with this.
Means quite literally nothing to his situationIt took Mack five years to reach those levels.
What years did most other superstars peak? Crosby's the exception not the rule"Of course he is"
What year did Crosby have his season statistically?
Means quite literally nothing to his situation
To Colorado
Auston Matthews
To Leafs
Nate MacKinnon
no agenda, don't care if it happens, not invested, it's August let's have some fun.
It took Mack five years to reach those levels.
You said "of course he will"What years did most other superstars peak? Crosby's the exception not the rule
Matthew's is a more complete player.
Mackinnon faceoff % at 42%...that's ugly
Matthews has the ability to be a 110-120 point player in a single season.