This is true. There's nothing wrong with the two transactions. I didn't say the transactions weren't good. I said I don't think this 4th line will be a good one. It will probably be better than the other 4th lines we've had, but I'm not projecting them to be adequate. I could be wrong of course. I've been wrong in questioning Bergevin/Julien moves before, but I've also been right.
Ultimately, because it's done 15 days before the deadline, there is still a little time to upgrade if need be. I'd rather a 4th line still have speed and skill, in addition to being defensively responsible. A little toughness is good, but still secondary to speed, and even secondary to skill. One fourth line I liked from the time we knocked top seeded Boston out of the playoffs was Bournival-Briere-Weise (younger Weise and Weise suited for the old NHL). I hope we're getting the same Weise. But I just don't know how his game would translate.
My ideal 4th line would be Marcus Johansson-Derrick Brassar-Weise/Shaw/Lehkonen/Byron. To me that's like a 2nd third line and adds good depth in case of injury. But those two MAY be too expensive. We'll see what they end up going for. I have a feeling they're under-valued in the market.
Those players you listed would require decent assets in return and I don't think Bergevin is willing to play that game.
Our 3 top lines are able to generate a good amount of offense so far this year.
The problem was the 4th line, they were generating nothing and getting scored on constantly.
The moves made were more to stop the bleeding than to actually help the offense.
But Weise can still skate and he has a decent shot , Thompson has some skill in him as he was playing on the PP in LA this year... And if Byron is on the left wing of that line I wouldn't be surprised if they actually generate offense and not just neutralizing the opposition.