Miller Time
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2004
- 23,066
- 15,413
pretty simple... if Dupuis is willing to take 3M$ per on a 2-3 year deal, then it's a no-brainer signing.
He'd be an excellent fit on a line with Bourque-Pleks, and as much as his production in recent years is tied to playing with Crosby, his career arc and MT's history with him give enough confidence to trust that, barring injury, he'll maintain a solid level of performance into his mid-30's.
we don't need him to be a 25-30 goal/55-65pt player... ~20goals/40pts, while playing a big minutes on a shut-down line with pleks would fill a big need, and because he's solid defensively, even if his production drops off more than that, he can still play important minutes/role.
If he's more focused on getting the big pay day coming off of his most productive season as a pro, then we shouldn't touch him... some team (Cgy, Dallas, Wpg?) will undoubtably be willing to go into the ~4M$/per territory, and at that level, we shouldn't be in the mix.
He'd be an excellent fit on a line with Bourque-Pleks, and as much as his production in recent years is tied to playing with Crosby, his career arc and MT's history with him give enough confidence to trust that, barring injury, he'll maintain a solid level of performance into his mid-30's.
we don't need him to be a 25-30 goal/55-65pt player... ~20goals/40pts, while playing a big minutes on a shut-down line with pleks would fill a big need, and because he's solid defensively, even if his production drops off more than that, he can still play important minutes/role.
If he's more focused on getting the big pay day coming off of his most productive season as a pro, then we shouldn't touch him... some team (Cgy, Dallas, Wpg?) will undoubtably be willing to go into the ~4M$/per territory, and at that level, we shouldn't be in the mix.