WinterLion
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 5,265
- 5,264
Seen someone make this chart. It helps!
Is that chart correct? Do we get the worse of the two picks in 2025? I thought it was the better.
Seen someone make this chart. It helps!
Is that chart correct? Do we get the worse of the two picks in 2025? I thought it was the better.
I have not read the entire thread but this trade and all its conditions is a great move, very Sam Pollockian of Hughes.MSN
www.msn.com
I'm just wondering if we have a chance at a top 10-15 overall pick? Maybe our chances are higher in 2025? 2026? The 2024 pick might end up a 20th to 32nd overall...if Calgary stays healthy and wins a lot, but with many injuries or subpar performances the 2024 1st rounder may end up a top 10-15 pick...you never know?!
"All in all, if the reported conditions are correct, the Canadiens have the potential to receive one of the following five outcomes:
2024 Calgary first-round pick
2025 Calgary first-round pick + potential 2025 Calgary fourth-round pick
2025 Florida first-round pick
2026 Calgary first-round pick + 2025 Calgary third-round pick
2026 Florida first-round pick + 2025 Calgary third-round pick"
Sure, but that limits the choice off the waiver wire. If a real deal comes up, like a quality, 4M RHD that they try to sneak through the waiver wire, hoping nobody can afford him, we would need to be able to pounce on that.Yea, if Byron starts the year on LTIR, they will have that extra $3.4M in cap relief on top of Price's $10.5M.
But if they don't need that extra 3.4M, then they'll surely just prefer to keep only Price on LTIR and keep Byron on regular IR (which would still count against the cap). And that would also depend on how much time Byron will miss.
Even with only Price on LTIR, they still have over $4M in cap space. It won't all go to Dach. So they will still have a couple million in space for other potential moves like a waiver pick up.
Yeah, a bit bizarre that CAL would handicap itself like that, unless it absolutely refuses to trade another 1st round pick in the next 4 years, other than the one Montreal ends up selecting.I have not read the entire thread but this trade and all its conditions is a great move, very Sam Pollockian of Hughes.
First being a 2025 pick (potentially 2024 or 2026 it gives Calgary and Fla time to become bad so it may end up being a higher than expected pick.
Second and maybe most importantly it sets him up for future deadline deals with Calgary. Calgary is in contend mode and will likely look to add at the deadline, KH has effectively put a lien on their 2024,2025 and 2026 1st round picks.
The option to change make it the 2024 pick if its a pick between 20 and 32 is brilliant. At 1st glance you say why did he add that he KH won't exercise it as the 2025/26 pick options will likely be better. But it makes it hard for the Flames to trade that pick now without another crap ton of conditions all affected by the rest of the conditions in this trade. The one team that it (2024 pick) can be traded to easily is the Habs. Maybe something around Drouin, Dandonov or even Monahan to Cal for their 2024 1st rounder at this years deadline.
Sure, but that limits the choice off the waiver wire. If a real deal comes up, like a quality, 4M RHD that they try to sneak through the waiver wire, hoping nobody can afford him, we would need to be able to pounce on that.
Not counting on such an occasion, but I'm sure you catch my drift...
Wow! What a chart! Cheers!Seen someone make this chart. It helps!
I have not read the entire thread but this trade and all its conditions is a great move, very Sam Pollockian of Hughes.
First being a 2025 pick (potentially 2024 or 2026 it gives Calgary and Fla time to become bad so it may end up being a higher than expected pick.
Second and maybe most importantly it sets him up for future deadline deals with Calgary. Calgary is in contend mode and will likely look to add at the deadline, KH has effectively put a lien on their 2024,2025 and 2026 1st round picks.
The option to change make it the 2024 pick if its a pick between 20 and 32 is brilliant. At 1st glance you say why did he add that he KH won't exercise it as the 2025/26 pick options will likely be better. But it makes it hard for the Flames to trade that pick now without another crap ton of conditions all affected by the rest of the conditions in this trade. The one team that it (2024 pick) can be traded to easily is the Habs. Maybe something around Drouin, Dandonov or even Monahan to Cal for their 2024 1st rounder at this years deadline.
Huh? How do you go from answering yes to "are CGY and FLO's 2025 1st top-10", to "is FLO's 1st NOT top 10"???Seen someone make this chart. It helps!
Huh? How do you go from answering yes to "are CGY and FLO's 2025 1st top-10", to "is FLO's 1st NOT top 10"???
Reminds me of...
That's the way I see it as well, though this is probably a contrarian view on this board. Much depends on the quality of his rehab post-surgery. If he is skating four times a week, as he claims in his interview on TheAthletic, his rehab must be progressing decently. Not sure if he is taking contact yet though.With Treliving saying that he expects, adding to the recent reports, that Monahan should be healthy to start the season which he hasn’t been for a long time.
I think the chances are good that the Habs will get a fine player on top of the 1st pick. What a trade for Hughes.
Yup definitely helps, clearest expansion I've read thus far.
Is that chart correct? Do we get the worse of the two picks in 2025? I thought it was the better.
It's not that complicated if you look at it like a matrix.It boils down to this:
Detailed table:
2025 CAL not top 10 CAL top 10 CAL 1st OVR FLO 17-32 MTL gets best pick MTL gets FLO pick MTL gets FLO pick FLO top 10 MTL gets CAL pick MTL gets CAL pick except 1st OVR MTL gets best 2026 unprotected pick + CAL 3rd round pick FLO 11-16 MTL gets CAL pick + CAL 4th round pick (if FLO pick not top 10, better than CAL, and was traded) MTL gets CAL pick except 1st OVR MTL gets best 2026 unprotected pick + CAL 3rd round pick
*edits: corrections in the table.
With Treliving saying that he expects, adding to the recent reports, that Monahan should be healthy to start the season which he hasn’t been for a long time.
I think the chances are good that the Habs will get a fine player on top of the 1st pick. What a trade for Hughes.
Hard to say but it would seem so based on little things said by Hughes and Treliving.So has it just been injuries the last few years as to why he's been junk? Genuinely asking.
There's no window for improving your team...if an opportunity arises to add a player who makes the Habs better, you do it.Not right now. Habs need to tank this year. After this season... they can trade good young asset for a player like that.
He's done. Has been for some time.Gotta love my fellow habs fans optimism, but y'all should forget about Monahan having a great season.
If he is, the trade is still worth it as a one-year cap dump for a 1st rounder. It’s not as if Habs are going anywhere this season or that they absolutely need him.He's done. Has been for some time.
He's not even healthy yet and people are saying, now that he's healthy again...He's done. Has been for some time.
I think most here are taking a wait and see approach. Any optimism has only been fueled from Hughes’ positive feedback during his due diligence.He's not even healthy yet and people are saying, now that he's healthy again...
Monahan also seems pretty optimistic. I hope he is healthy enough to salvage his career.I think most here are taking a wait and see approach. Any optimism has only been fueled from Hughes’ positive feedback during his due diligence.
Some guys are "done" because they never get "healthy" enough again.He's not even healthy yet and people are saying, now that he's healthy again...
AgreedIf he is, the trade is still worth it as a one-year cap dump for a 1st rounder. It’s not as if Habs are going anywhere this season or that they absolutely need him.