2Pair
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2017
- 12,633
- 5,103
yeah, it was either 5x5 or 7.5x7 there's nothing in between those two optionsYeah, Spurgeon is a 5 x $5 player at best.
yeah, it was either 5x5 or 7.5x7 there's nothing in between those two optionsYeah, Spurgeon is a 5 x $5 player at best.
It's funny you say that because the Twins and the Wild are polar opposites..but at the same time so connected..I prefer owners that want to win. The Twins could do with one.
yeah, it was either 5x5 or 7.5x7 there's nothing in between those two options
Spurgeon looking like a $7M player to you? Maybe he'll look better in 7 years?Well, when you use the word "way" it sure ain't 6 years and it sure ain't $7.4 million is it?
Spurgeon looking like a $7M player to you? Maybe he'll look better in 7 years?
Spurgeon looking like a $7M player to you? Maybe he'll look better in 7 years?
The Wild are going to suck this year, we all can see that. That doesn't mean that should automatically be the expectation next year. We have talent in this organization, we have a very good top 4 on defense. An influx of skilled and creative forwards could inject a lot of life into the Stanley Cup outlook very quickly.It's funny you say that because the Twins and the Wild are polar opposites..but at the same time so connected..
Wild owner wants to win so bad that he cant stand the fact that the wild would suck for a year.. which they should do this year.. legit.
Twins owners wanna just make money..and this ****ing sucks because they have the best team of the Minnesota teams,, but they wont do anything to make it better..
All I want is a realistic owner and where their product is
Hunt, tbh
Source?Hextall told him it needed a rebuild, and didn't get hired. I've been a Leipold supporter for the most part, but he has got face facts, if the Wild don't turn it around by Christmas...remember, STL was a laughingstock for the first part of last year .
Then we're fine. Spurgeon is "earning" Hunt's money, and Hunt is "earning" Spurgeon's. Zero sum game.
Spurgeon has a longer shelf life and can come in handy again if we can get back on track next season.
No, and there aren't many guys on the roster that I want to keep around for 8 more years eitherIs anybody looking like a $4 million player?
7years for Spurgeon was too long, I agree.Zucc was 31 when he signed this deal, Spurgeon will be 30 when his kicks in. Both of the deals are way too long and for too much money.
It's funny you say that because the Twins and the Wild are polar opposites..but at the same time so connected..
Wild owner wants to win so bad that he cant stand the fact that the wild would suck for a year.. which they should do this year.. legit.
Twins owners wanna just make money..and this ****ing sucks because they have the best team of the Minnesota teams,, but they wont do anything to make it better..
All I want is a realistic owner and where their product is
Can't believe the game thread got locked.. is there no conversation to be had? Or any conversation that involves disagreement....come on now
The conversation isn't about 4 games.Spurgeon being too long has nothing to do with the first 4 games of this season. It's a bridge to cross in 5 years.
The conversation isn't about 4 games.