2Pair
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2017
- 12,633
- 5,103
Stalock is not an NHL goalie.Stalock hasn't failed in a single playoff game. He might be below average goalie, but that's a good place to start.
Stalock is not an NHL goalie.Stalock hasn't failed in a single playoff game. He might be below average goalie, but that's a good place to start.
For a guy that loves to use stats, why wouldn't you use the real numbers?Average how?
Hate to do this because The Athletic is worth the few bucks it costs you every month literally every single day you read it. But a snippet:
For a guy that loves to use stats, why wouldn't you use the real numbers?
A lot of those stats are driven by him being a workhorse and, at least in the regular season, he does well in the Wild's system. Over the same span no goalie has a higher expected Sv%. Of the 15 starters that have played in 20+ playoff games since 2015 he has the highest playoff expected Sv%, he's last in actual Sv%, 13/15th in GAA.Average how?
Hate to do this because The Athletic is worth the few bucks it costs you every month literally every single day you read it. But a snippet:
A lot of those stats are driven by him being a workhorse and, at least in the regular season, he does well in the Wild's system. Over the same span no goalie has a higher expected Sv%. Of the 15 starters that have played in 20+ playoff games since 2015 he has the highest playoff expected Sv%, he's last in actual Sv%, 13/15th in GAA.
Ok, so he's a workhorse and that's bad. He was awful against Dallas in 2016, the year where the Wild was the last wild card and Dallas was the Western Conference regular season champions. Guess that was also all on him being a workhorse. The years since he has a .600 quality start percentage in the playoffs, which is .... good. Definitely not good enough to single-handedly beat teams 0-0 but good.
All you guys that rag on Dubnyk have yet to suggest a plausible upgrade. He has a good contract and is a good goalie. He is BY FAR the player of least concern on the entire team in terms of contract, performance, age, upside. This is a bad conversation.
I didn't say him being a workhorse was bad, I think it's one of his better qualities though it does seem to burn him out late in the season, I said that a lot of his stats are helped by how many games he has played. To pick and choose which series are relevant and which aren't is a bit disingenuous when trying to argue his worth, but you are also heftily overblowing that series. The Wild lost 2-4 and 3 of those losses were by 1 goal when he was "awful"Ok, so he's a workhorse and that's bad. He was awful against Dallas in 2016, the year where the Wild was the last wild card and Dallas was the Western Conference regular season champions. Guess that was also all on him being a workhorse. The years since he has a .600 quality start percentage in the playoffs, which is .... good. Definitely not good enough to single-handedly beat teams 0-0 but good.
All you guys that rag on Dubnyk have yet to suggest a plausible upgrade. He has a good contract and is a good goalie. He is BY FAR the player of least concern on the entire team in terms of contract, performance, age, upside. This is a bad conversation.
Are you suggesting that just because there isn’t a viable upgrade available at the moment, that we can’t criticize or fault Dubnyk for his role in the lack of team playoff success?
I don’t want to put words in your mouth, so I’m asking, but the way you phrased the last paragraph makes it seem like you think criticism is unfair because no one has suggested an alternative option.
Stalock hasn't failed in a single playoff game. He might be below average goalie, but that's a good place to start.
Please just let the season start already.
Who the hell was Dubnyk before he got in the Wild system? The guy was just about out of the league when the Wild got him. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see a guy like Howard put up better numbers than Dubnyk in this system. I don't think getting rid of Dubnyk is a good idea, but I was hopeful that Fenton was going to get a real backup this summer. Lehner or Mrazek at the deals they signed, would've been very interesting to see play for this team.I think criticism is overblown. It's fair to want better performances.
That said, salary aside - what goalie is a better option for 2018-19? Give me legacy stats, all-time wins, Cups, Vezinas, the guy who will be the best performer for the next three seasons on average: I want to know the name and the name of the GM who's going to trade him. Is it Price, Lundqvist, Rask, Murray, Samsonov, Vasilevsky? A guy like Robin Lehner? Holtby? Hellebuyck? Seriously, a guy who's as good as Dubnyk is hard to get. Getting a guy who's better? Pretty much impossible. I know they could probably trade for Jimmy Howard. They could pick up a guy off waivers, go for a Cal Pickard. Teams would line up to get Dubnyk. If it's Stalock, Kahkonen, and the Hamburglar, this team is not making the playoffs or getting a chance to prove the doubters wrong.
If they have a good defensive team I don't think improving offense means Dubnyk falls off a cliff in any category. Do you guys?
The hyperbole is strong with this one.Doobie doobski cant stop a beach ball most nights. He’ll figure in for a lot of Laines 50+ goal season.
Who the hell was Dubnyk before he got in the Wild system? The guy was just about out of the league when the Wild got him. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see a guy like Howard put up better numbers than Dubnyk in this system. I don't think getting rid of Dubnyk is a good idea, but I was hopeful that Fenton was going to get a real backup this summer. Lehner or Mrazek at the deals they signed, would've been very interesting to see play for this team.
He was a guy that was largely solid behind Edmonton's **** defense with the exception of one year where he put on one of the worst performances by a goalie ever.
The only Central team we haven't played in the playoffs since the divisional format!It looks like the Wild have 13 games on NBC/NBCSN this season, it looks like they are trying to pump up the Preds/Wild rivalry with 3 games.
It looks like the Wild have 13 games on NBC/NBCSN this season, it looks like they are trying to pump up the Preds/Wild rivalry with 3 games.
Don't worry, we have "Star Sunday" now.Too bad they scrapped the Wednesday Night Rivalry format, how else are we supposed to watch the classic Wild/Bruins rivalry on national TV?
Or NBC is higher on the Wild than we are and they just like the tough match-up for the contending Predators.It looks like the Wild have 13 games on NBC/NBCSN this season, it looks like they are trying to pump up the Preds/Wild rivalry with 3 games.
Or NBC is higher on the Wild than we are and they just like the tough match-up for the contending Predators.
Wasn't always the case. We had a time where we'd see only 4-5 national games in a season.That, and the Wild always gets a good number of national games because the Wild produce good ratings, due to a strong local following. Same reason Buffalo always has a ton of national games.